David A. Grant

Partner

Washington, D.C.
T 202.861.1638  |  F 202.861.1783

"...His thorough knowledge and understanding of our unique organization and culture has been especially valuable to establishing our collaborative relationship that has lasted more than 25 years."

— This comment appears on the U.S. News & Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" website at bestlawfirms.usnews.com

David Grant represents clients in wage and hour matters and investigations, unfair labor practice charges and hearings, collective bargaining negotiations, litigation, mediation, and arbitration. With 35 years of experience, he navigates clients through all aspects of labor and employment law, with the goal of zealously representing clients while promoting respectful and dignified treatment of all individuals in the workplace. David looks to develop a deep understanding of his clients’ businesses, to help anticipate and prevent workplace disputes before they arise.

David is the national leader of the Firm's Employment and Labor Group. He is a frequent speaker on wage and hour and other employment law issues. He is listed in The Best Lawyers in America© in Washington, D.C., in Employment Law–Management and Litigation–Labor and Employment. He is a contributor to BakerHostetler's Employment Class Action blog, offering commentary on recent class action decisions and trends affecting employers.

Select Experience

  • Represents military government contractor in employment law matters, including issues arising at the intersection of the National Labor Relations Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Service Contract Act.
  • Represented security company faced with public picketing and unfair labor practice charges initiated by major East Coast labor union. No administrative complaint ensued from these charges; the picketing proceeded peacefully with no disruption of the company’s business.
  • Negotiated successor collective bargaining agreements between local affiliate of leading media enterprise and several local unions that have resulted in preservation and expansion of news operations. Understandings were reached among the unions and the employer through principled collaboration and constructive dialogue focused on the legitimate business issues at the heart of these negotiations.
More »

Experience

  • Represents military government contractor in employment law matters, including issues arising at the intersection of the National Labor Relations Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Service Contract Act.
  • Represented security company faced with public picketing and unfair labor practice charges initiated by major East Coast labor union. No administrative complaint ensued from these charges; the picketing proceeded peacefully with no disruption of the company’s business.
  • Negotiated successor collective bargaining agreements between local affiliate of leading media enterprise and several local unions that have resulted in preservation and expansion of news operations. Understandings were reached among the unions and the employer through principled collaboration and constructive dialogue focused on the legitimate business issues at the heart of these negotiations.
  • Represented Fortune 500 company in surprise unannounced investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor of the company's payroll practices and federal wage and hour compliance at the relevant establishment.  At the conclusion of the investigation, the agency investigator expressed appreciation for the company’s professionalism.
  • With diplomatic counseling, worked through highly sensitive workplace conduct issues at an employer in the public eye. The situation was resolved quietly and amicably with no adverse publicity.
  • Defended a transportation employer in federal district court litigation implicating alleged race, national origin, and disability discrimination.  The matter was resolved in mediation for far less than defense costs.
  • Represented employer during reorganization of a national non-profit. No charges arose out of this reorganization. The employer subsequently has been able to expand its services.

Recognitions

  • The Legal 500 United States: "Recommended Lawyer"
    • Labor and employment - Labor and employment litigation (2015)
    • Labor and employment - Labor-management relations (2015)
  • The Best Lawyers in America©
    • Washington, D.C.: Employment Law - Management (2013 to 2016)
    • Washington, D.C.: Labor Law - Management (2016)
    • Washington, D.C.: Litigation - Labor & Employment (2013 to 2016)
  • Martindale-Hubbell: AV Preeminent

Services

Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court, 1994
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 1979
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 1986
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1987
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 1990
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 1994
  • District of Columbia, 1978

Education

  • J.D., Georgetown University Law Center, 1978
  • A.B., Bowdoin College, 1975, summa cum laude

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Employment Class Action Blog
The Board vs. the Courts: Will 2016 mark the final showdown for class action waivers in arbitration agreements?
By Kelline R. Linton
January 25, 2016
Arbitration agreements are practical tools that help employers protect confidential information and avoid the costs associated with traditional litigation. They can also be an extremely effective mechanism for employers to reduce exposure...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
The Next Chapter – Uber Responds to District Court Order With a New Arbitration Agreement
December 15, 2015
Not only did Uber respond to the district court’s December 9, 2015, ruling (discussed in our December 11 blog) with an immediate notice of appeal, but on December 11 it rolled out a new arbitration agreement for its drivers. This maneuver...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
District Judge Rules Uber’s Arbitration Agreements Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds
December 11, 2015
On September 2, we addressed the much-publicized O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. case (No. 13-cv-03826-EMC) pending before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In O’Connor, a group of 160,000 current and...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Court Grants Summary Judgment for Employer in Apple Class Action Seeking Pay for Time Spent in Security Checks
November 12, 2015
Free Choice Tanks Plaintiffs’ Claims Just last year, the Supreme Court held in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 135 S. Ct. 513 (2014) that employees working at an Amazon.com warehouse were not entitled to overtime pay for time...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Justices Take On Another California Rule – When an Arbitration Agreement Is Too Flawed to Enforce
October 8, 2015
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts a California state court rule on unconscionable provisions that is purportedly applied more stringently to arbitration agreements than to other...
Read More ->