Practice Strengths

Executive Compensation and 409A Compliance

Helping Clients Reach Goals


BakerHostetler advises clients regarding executive compensation strategies, including short and long-term incentive plans. These plans can offer tax advantages as well as long-term incentives for employees. We provide employers with plan designs and employee communication materials that are understandable to employees and that comply with all of the tax, labor and securities law requirements.

Given the changes in the law that limit the tax benefits for executives under tax-qualified retirement plans, we advise employers on alternative approaches to provide retirement income to executives. We prepare nonqualified plans and excess benefit plans, individualized deferred compensation arrangements and golden parachutes. We have developed strategies to address the special challenges that the Section 409A rules present.

We advise and represent clients in all types of executive compensation matters. Understanding that executive compensation is effective only when it furthers the client's strategic objectives, we have helped clients reach their goals in a wide array of situations, including the following:

  • The public company that perennially seeks to attract and retain key people to serve as directors, officers and key managers.

  • The public company that regularly needs to rotate its key managers among an array of subsidiaries and affiliates, including some situated in foreign countries.

  • The privately held company that sought to separate selected key employees from employment, during an ownership transition, without driving them into the arms of a competitor and impairing the company's enterprise value.

  • The Internet company that needed to rebuff attempts by a former executive to exercise his stock options.

  • The privately held company that needed to offset built-up deferred compensation owed to a departing executive against amounts owed to the company by the executive.

  • The tax-exempt institution that sought to retain its executive director because of his unique fund-raising abilities.

  • The privately held real estate development company that needed to strategically reposition itself to sell services rather than rent real estate.

  • Public and private companies that sought to preserve the enterprise value of their respective businesses during periods of organizational disruption (which have included bankruptcies, and industry wide consolidations) by using employment agreements and long-term equity incentives to “lock up” selected management team members.

  • The professional services company that needed to reinforce its collaborative culture through the use of project-based profit-sharing pools controlled by those who participated in the project.

  • Public company executives who needed to preserve built-up contract and stock rights, to comply with company-based stock ownership requirements, which were threatened by divorcing spouses.

  • Private business owners who found themselves compelled to restructure their businesses in order to monetize the interests of a divorcing spouse without undermining the business's viability or forcing a sale.

  • Executives solicited to join other organizations, but unsure of their obligations to their present employers under existing employment covenants.

The list continues to grow.

We use a collaborative approach which matches up our clients' needs with the experience needed to attain their varying goals and objectives. To do so, our executive compensation team reaches out to an array of attorneys whose practices are concentrated in fields such as federal and state income and employment taxation; employment and employment litigation; employee benefits; federal and state securities regulation; intellectual property; domestic relations; private wealth planning; and creditors' rights/bankruptcy. Through this process, we orchestrate solutions to complex—and widely varying—client challenges.

Section 409A Compliance


When the IRS and Treasury issued new "Section 409A" rules governing deferred compensation plans and potentially affecting countless other forms of compensation, BakerHostetler recognized the likely impact on clients. Compensation subject to 409A Compliance Regulations includes:
  • stock options
  • severance pay
  • bonus payments
  • restricted stock
  • partnership payments
  • post-employment fringe benefits
  • perquisites

To address related compliance issues for our clients, BakerHostetler utilized a coordinated approach. The team reviewed client compensation-related plans, contracts and arrangements, identifying (and fixing, where necessary) those found to be subject to the rules. The team furthered provided counsel on disclosure and reporting obligations. As a service to clients and friends of BakerHostetler, our Executive Compensation team also prepared a series of Alerts explaining specific aspects of 409A compliance.

 

Link to BakerHostetler Internal Revenue Code Section 409A
Executive Alerts

Contact

National Contacts
John J. McGowan, Jr.
216.861.7475


William M. Toomajian
216.861.7569


Contacts by Office »

Practice Highlights

Our coordinated, multi-disciplinary and multi-office approach enables executives and organizations to focus on the strategic value and effectiveness of all types of compensatory arrangements.

Chambers USA lists three team members as leading practitioners in this area of law.