Jonathan L. Lewis

Partner

Washington, D.C.
T 202.861.1557  |  F 202.861.1783

Jonathan Lewis is an antitrust lawyer with experience representing clients in antitrust and commercial litigation matters and merger reviews. His antitrust experience also includes counseling clients on distribution and business matters. Practical yet creative, Jonathan approaches situations from a business perspective, developing solutions that will meet and sustain his clients' corporate objectives.

Jonathan has been described by Global Competition Review as an "up and coming antitrust lawyer" and "talented litigator" with "a particularly impressive background, having worked in economic consulting before law school." He is a regular contributor to BakerHostetler's Antitrust Advocate blog, providing informative commentary on the latest antitrust developments.

Select Experience

  • Represented one of Canada’s oldest and largest biopharmaceutical companies throughout the merger clearance process in connection with the sale of that company.
  • Represented worldwide software and product lifecycle management solutions leader throughout merger clearance with acquisition of leading provider of manufacturing software solutions.
  • Advised leading manufacturer of mining and other industrial equipment in its $8.6 billion acquisition of manufacturer of equipment used in surface and underground mining during integration of company.
  • Represented leading steel manufacturer in connection with allegations that steel producers entered into multiyear antitrust conspiracy to reduce production of steel products in the United States through coordinated production cuts for the express purpose of raising price of steel products.
More »

Experience

  • Represented one of Canada’s oldest and largest biopharmaceutical companies throughout the merger clearance process in connection with the sale of that company.
  • Represented worldwide software and product lifecycle management solutions leader throughout merger clearance with acquisition of leading provider of manufacturing software solutions.
  • Advised leading manufacturer of mining and other industrial equipment in its $8.6 billion acquisition of manufacturer of equipment used in surface and underground mining during integration of company.
  • Represented leading steel manufacturer in connection with allegations that steel producers entered into multiyear antitrust conspiracy to reduce production of steel products in the United States through coordinated production cuts for the express purpose of raising price of steel products.
  • Represented affiliates of leading wireless carrier in disputes and related transactions. Cases were resolved by wireless carrier acquiring affiliates for approximately $831 million in cash and assumed debt.
    • Represented three affiliates of leading wireless carrier seeking to enjoin $11 billion transaction from closing. Case was resolved after expedited discovery.
    • Member of trial and appellate teams that represented affiliate of leading wireless carrier in dispute regarding breach of management agreement between parties. Lawsuit alleging a merger would result in breach of certain exclusivity rights was filed after wireless carrier announced $35 billion merger with competitor. Injunction was issued requiring wireless carrier to divest itself of the competing network and assets in affiliate’s service area. Decision was affirmed by Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court denied petition for leave to appeal.
    • Member of trial team that represented two affiliates of leading wireless carrier in a dispute regarding a breach of management agreements between the parties. Court ordered wireless carrier to cease using its trademark to promote competing products in affiliates’ exclusive territories.
  • Represented leading healthcare system against antitrust claims of price fixing brought on behalf of purported class of registered nurses employed by defendant hospital systems. District court denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification of approximately 19,000 registered nurses in 52-page opinion. Settled after plaintiffs' motion for class certification was denied.
  • Advised largest single health carrier in the United States with regard to $2.6 billion acquisition.
  • Advised leading home appliance manufacturer with regard to $1.79 billion acquisition and $107 million sale of non-core product line.
  • Member of team that represented nation’s premier marketing services company in case in which competitor claimed that client’s exclusive contracts with retailers and other conduct violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, the Illinois Antitrust Act, and various common law duties. Obtained summary judgment in favor of client and court rejected plaintiffs’ definition of relevant product market. Decision was unanimously affirmed by panel of the Seventh Circuit.

Memberships

  • American Bar Association: Antitrust Section
  • Illinois State Bar Association
    • Antitrust & Unfair Competition Law Section Council: Former Chairman

News

Services

Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
  • District of Columbia
  • Illinois

Education

  • J.D., University of Michigan Law School, 1999, cum laude
  • M.P.M., University of Maryland, 1993
  • B.A., University of Maryland, 1992, with honors in Economics

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Antitrust Advocate
Join BakerHostetler’s Carl Hittinger for Webinar Presentation on Antitrust Risks for Trade Associations and Members
May 22, 2015
BakerHostetler antitrust partner Carl Hittinger will be a panelist on an upcoming live webinar, “Antitrust Risks for Trade Associations and Members: Ensuring Compliance Amid Intense Federal Scrutiny,” scheduled for Wednesday, June 3...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
‘Actavis’ Still Raising More Questions Than It Answers
May 21, 2015
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013), “reverse payment” settlements in patent litigation between brand-name drug manufacturers and potential generic...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Fit to Be Tied: Appeals Court Redefines Tying Arrangements Based on Bundled Pricing
May 15, 2015
Corporate antitrust compliance programs often spotlight the dangers of tying arrangements. Those risks arise when a seller with a dominant position in one product coerces its customers by offering that must-have product only if customers...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Apple’s Streaming Music Service Under Investigation
May 7, 2015
It has been a busy several months for antitrust regulators and the tech giants whose alleged conduct has recently drawn their ire. Just a few weeks ago, Google formally became the subject of a European investigation into its alleged...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
EU Tells Google to Try Harder
April 16, 2015
It’s official: on Wednesday, in a formal Statement of Objections, the European Union’s antitrust chief formally accused Google of abusing its dominant position in the web search arena. The European Commission is focused on Google’s alleged...
Read More ->