Charlie C. Lyu

Associate

Philadelphia
T +1.215.564.3580
F +1.215.568.3439

Overview

Charlie Lyu focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation and trademark and copyright prosecution. Charlie routinely handles patent, trademark, copyright and indemnity disputes, and has represented companies both large and small in federal court and U.S. International Trade Commission litigations. He also routinely counsels clients on domestic and international trademark procurement, clearance and registration. Charlie's experience in all aspects of intellectual property law gives him a unique perspective on analyzing a company's intellectual property needs.

Select Experience

Patent
  • Represented a Fortune 500 company in patent litigation involving encryption technology.
  • Represented a Fortune 500 company in patent litigation involving database mapping technology.
Trademark
  • Provides comprehensive trademark services to a textile company and an apparel company that include worldwide clearance and trademark prosecution services and the management of a worldwide trademark portfolio.  
  • Provides trademark enforcement services to a game manufacturer.
Copyright
  • Represented a retail company in defending claims of copyright infringement based on the plaintiff's purported copyright in cosplay costumes.
More »

Experience

Patent
  • Represented a Fortune 500 company in patent litigation involving encryption technology.
  • Represented a Fortune 500 company in patent litigation involving database mapping technology.
  • Represented a multinational company accused of patent infringement in the International Trade Commission.
  • Represented a Fortune 500 company in indemnification recovery efforts against its suppliers.
Trademark
  • Provides comprehensive trademark services to a textile company and an apparel company that include worldwide clearance and trademark prosecution services and the management of a worldwide trademark portfolio.  
  • Provides trademark enforcement services to a game manufacturer.
  • Represented a fabric manufacturer in a TTAB cancellation proceeding.
  • Represented a grill manufacturer in asserting trade dress infringement claims against a competitor.
Copyright
  • Represented a retail company in defending claims of copyright infringement based on the plaintiff's purported copyright in cosplay costumes.

Recognitions and Memberships

Admissions

  • Georgia
  • [Not admitted in Pennsylvania]

Education

  • J.D., University of Miami School of Law, 2008, cum laude
  • B.A., Economics, Emory University, 2003

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Core Wireless: Moving Beyond Eligibility as the Exception to the Exception?
By Brendan E. Clark
February 8, 2018
January was an exciting month for patent professionals still attempting to make sense of the fallout from the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International decision. Hot on the heels of its Jan. 10 decision in Finjan, Inc. v...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems: Attaching Security Profile to a Downloadable Is Patent Eligible
January 16, 2018
In Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered a decision containing interesting rulings on patentable subject matter (affirming the District Court determination that certain claims were patent...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit Finds Lanham Act Clause Banning Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks Unconstitutional
January 9, 2018
On December 15, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down as unconstitutional the clause within 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a) (“Section 2(a)”) banning registration of a trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral…or...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Amended PTAB Rules to Take Effect on May 2, 2016
By Charlie C. Lyu
April 28, 2016
On May 2, 2016, amended rules governing post-grant proceedings before the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (“PTAB”), including inter partes review (“IPR”), post-grant review (“PGR”), and covered business methods (“CBM”), will take effect. The...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Fourth Circuit Holds No Use in the U.S. Required to Bring Claims Under the Lanham Act
By Charlie C. Lyu
March 31, 2016
On March 23, 2016, the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s decision in Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG, 84 F. Supp. 3d 490 (E.D. Va. 2015) and remanded the case. The Fourth Circuit held that contrary to the district court’s...
Read More ->