Class Action Defense - Appeals

Overview

Skilled in all phases of class action appeals, BakerHostetler’s Class Action Defense team represents clients before federal and state appellate courts in class certification appeals and appeals on the merits.

With decades of litigation experience, our attorneys are adept at creating persuasive written briefs and presenting strong and convincing oral arguments. We have successfully represented clients in appeals of class certification rulings and related issues in both state and federal courts.

Members of our Class Action Defense team have partnered with our national appellate team in preparing amicus briefs in several U.S. Supreme Court cases involving class action issues, including The Standard Fire Insurance Company, Petitioner v. Greg Knowles, Respondent and Comcast Corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. Caroline Behrend, et al., Respondents.

Select Experience

  • Represented one of the largest national auto insurance companies in defense of an appeal of the denial of class certification in an action challenging specification of non-OEM body parts in covered repairs. Denial of class action affirmed on appeal.
  • Obtained key reversal in the Seventh Circuit of class certification in a major property damage class action against one of the nation’s largest insurers. In addition to saving our client tens of millions of dollars in reinspection and repair costs, the appellate court’s decision also established groundbreaking new principles in class certification rules.
  • Obtained affirmance of summary judgment in Florida court of appeals in favor of a national title insurer, eliminating client’s potential exposure to class damages in the range of $50 to $100 million. The decision also relieved title insurers throughout the state of liability in similar cases pending in trial courts.
More »

Experience

  • Represented one of the largest national auto insurance companies in defense of an appeal of the denial of class certification in an action challenging specification of non-OEM body parts in covered repairs. Denial of class action affirmed on appeal.
  • Obtained key reversal in the Seventh Circuit of class certification in a major property damage class action against one of the nation’s largest insurers. In addition to saving our client tens of millions of dollars in reinspection and repair costs, the appellate court’s decision also established groundbreaking new principles in class certification rules.
  • Obtained affirmance of summary judgment in Florida court of appeals in favor of a national title insurer, eliminating client’s potential exposure to class damages in the range of $50 to $100 million. The decision also relieved title insurers throughout the state of liability in similar cases pending in trial courts.
  • Achieved victory on behalf of a large regional bank with a Sixth Circuit decision providing greater assurance to Ohio banks that they cannot be held liable for alleged fraudulent activities of account holders years after those activities occur and that there is finality to commercial transactions involving negotiable instruments.
  • Successfully defended on appeal the decertification of class in putative class action against title insurance company seeking discounts on title insurance. The decision reaffirmed strict adherence to the class-action requirement of predominance and introduced the concept of the impermissible “fail-safe” class to the Sixth Circuit.
  • Successfully obtained review and reversed certification of class against telephone provider in Ohio Supreme Court on grounds that it is proper to evaluate the merits of plaintiffs’ claims when considering class certification requirements, extending Walmart v. Dukes to Ohio law.
  • Successfully defended on appeal the denial of class certification in putative class action against insurance company seeking payment of interest on settlements.

Recognition

  • Chambers USA: Litigation
    • Litigation: General Commercial (Ohio) – Band 2 (2020)
    • Litigation: General Commercial (Colorado) – Recognized (2019)
    • Retail: National – Band 3 (2020)
  • Law360: Class Action "Practice Group of the Year" (2014)
  • LA Daily Journal: Top Appellate Reversals of 2014
  • Corporate Counsel® magazine guide to in-house law departments: "Go-to Law Firm" for litigation.
  • Recognized as one of the top law firms for client service, BakerHostetler was named to the 2020 BTI Client Service 30 for the sixth consecutive year.

News

Publications

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
The U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case Regarding Whether State Business Registration Requirements Can Create General Personal Jurisdiction
May 3, 2022
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state from requiring a corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction as a condition to doing business in the state...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Concrete and Particularized Part II: What Spokeo May Mean for Class Actions
May 20, 2016
This blog post is the second in a series of posts that Baker & Hostetler LLP is devoting to the significant decision Robins v. Spokeo, No. 13-1339, 537 U.S. ___ (2016) (Spokeo). Monday’s post focused on Spokeo’s effect on privacy class...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Supreme Court Holds That Plaintiffs Must Allege Concrete and Particularized Injury To Have Standing To Assert FCRA Claim
May 16, 2016
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., which addressed the question of whether a plaintiff has satisfied Article III’s injury-in-fact standing requirement by alleging a statutory violation but no concrete injury. Our...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
CFPB Announces Proposed Ban to Mandatory Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
May 12, 2016
Our Financial Services Blog recently posted about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on a proposed rule to prohibit covered institutions from including, in most core consumer contracts...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
The Eighth Circuit Weighs in on Ascertainability
May 9, 2016
Last week, the Eighth Circuit weighed in on a hot and unsettled topic: the ascertainability standard for class certification. In Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc., No. 15-1317, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7992 (8th Cir. May...
Read More ->