Class Action Defense - Appeals

Overview

Skilled in all phases of class action appeals, BakerHostetler’s Class Action Defense team represents clients before federal and state appellate courts in class certification appeals and appeals on the merits.

With decades of litigation experience, our attorneys are adept at creating persuasive written briefs and presenting strong and convincing oral arguments. We have successfully represented clients in appeals of class certification rulings and related issues in both state and federal courts.

Members of our Class Action Defense team have partnered with our national appellate team in preparing amicus briefs in several U.S. Supreme Court cases involving class action issues, including The Standard Fire Insurance Company, Petitioner v. Greg Knowles, Respondent and Comcast Corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. Caroline Behrend, et al., Respondents.

Select Experience

  • Represented one of the largest national auto insurance companies in defense of an appeal of the denial of class certification in an action challenging specification of non-OEM body parts in covered repairs. Denial of class action affirmed on appeal.
  • Obtained key reversal in the Seventh Circuit of class certification in a major property damage class action against one of the nation’s largest insurers. In addition to saving our client tens of millions of dollars in reinspection and repair costs, the appellate court’s decision also established groundbreaking new principles in class certification rules.
  • Obtained affirmance of summary judgment in Florida court of appeals in favor of a national title insurer, eliminating client’s potential exposure to class damages in the range of $50 to $100 million. The decision also relieved title insurers throughout the state of liability in similar cases pending in trial courts.
More »

Professionals

Name Title Office Email
Partner Columbus
Partner Cleveland
Partner Cleveland
Partner Cleveland
Partner Columbus
Partner Denver
Partner New York
Partner Cleveland
Partner Columbus
Partner New York
Partner Columbus
Partner Cleveland
Partner Cleveland

Experience

  • Represented one of the largest national auto insurance companies in defense of an appeal of the denial of class certification in an action challenging specification of non-OEM body parts in covered repairs. Denial of class action affirmed on appeal.
  • Obtained key reversal in the Seventh Circuit of class certification in a major property damage class action against one of the nation’s largest insurers. In addition to saving our client tens of millions of dollars in reinspection and repair costs, the appellate court’s decision also established groundbreaking new principles in class certification rules.
  • Obtained affirmance of summary judgment in Florida court of appeals in favor of a national title insurer, eliminating client’s potential exposure to class damages in the range of $50 to $100 million. The decision also relieved title insurers throughout the state of liability in similar cases pending in trial courts.
  • Achieved victory on behalf of a large regional bank with a Sixth Circuit decision providing greater assurance to Ohio banks that they cannot be held liable for alleged fraudulent activities of account holders years after those activities occur and that there is finality to commercial transactions involving negotiable instruments.
  • Successfully defended on appeal the decertification of class in putative class action against title insurance company seeking discounts on title insurance. The decision reaffirmed strict adherence to the class-action requirement of predominance and introduced the concept of the impermissible “fail-safe” class to the Sixth Circuit.
  • Successfully obtained review and reversed certification of class against telephone provider in Ohio Supreme Court on grounds that it is proper to evaluate the merits of plaintiffs’ claims when considering class certification requirements, extending Walmart v. Dukes to Ohio law.
  • Successfully defended on appeal the denial of class certification in putative class action against insurance company seeking payment of interest on settlements.

News

Publications

Key Contacts

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
TCPA Class Denied Certification Due to Binding Authority of Yaakov and Proof of Individualized Issues of Consent
November 13, 2017
A recent order from the Northern District of Illinois granted a defendant’s motion to deny class certification regarding “unsolicited” fax advertisements allegedly sent in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Eleventh Circuit Outlines the Key to an Individual Arbitration Agreement
October 10, 2017
The Eleventh Circuit recently upheld an arbitration agreement in a consumer class action involving checking overdraft fees. In Johnson v. KeyBank N.A., 11th Cir. No. 15-10779 (Sept. 26, 2017), the plaintiffs brought a putative class action...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Corporation and Its Managers Held in Civil Contempt for Failing to Comply With Settlement Final Approval Order
September 26, 2017
Last month, Global Fitness Holdings LLC and its four managers were held in civil contempt for failure to comply with a final order approving a class action settlement. Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, S.D. Ohio No. 2:11-cv-436 (Aug...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Seventh Circuit Rejects Subway Footlong Class Settlement as a “Racket”
September 19, 2017
A recent Seventh Circuit decision pushed back on a proposed settlement of the Subway “footlong sub” class action, finding the proposed settlement a “racket” designed to benefit class counsel without any benefit to the class. The story...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Ninth Circuit again finds Article III standing in Spokeo: The injury was particularized in round one, and it’s concrete in round two.
August 23, 2017
The Spokeo saga continues. As our sister blog, the Data Privacy Monitor, reported here, the United States Supreme Court’s May 2016 decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1550 (2016) (Spokeo II) vacated and remanded a Ninth...
Read More ->