Darley Maw

Associate

New York
T +1.212.589.4617
F +1.212.589.4201

Overview

Darley Maw's commercial litigation practice relies on her strong work ethic, substantial legal knowledge and commitment to meeting clients' needs. She has significant experience on issues pertinent to commercial law and white collar defense cases, and her background includes serving as a former law clerk to a federal judge and working as a member of the BakerHostetler team representing Trustee Irving H. Picard for the SIPA liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, an unprecedented effort that involves hundreds of actions to recover funds from the largest financial crime in U.S. history.

Select Experience

  • Member of the BakerHostetler team representing Trustee Irving H. Picard for the SIPA liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, an unprecedented recovery effort that involves hundreds of actions.
  • Represented client in a complex commercial dispute in the Central District of California and the Southern District of New York involving a variety of claims and counterclaims including breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and false advertising.
  • Represented client involved in Department of Justice investigations and conducted in-depth analyses of key documents and records.
More »

Experience

  • Member of the BakerHostetler team representing Trustee Irving H. Picard for the SIPA liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, an unprecedented recovery effort that involves hundreds of actions.
  • Represented client in a complex commercial dispute in the Central District of California and the Southern District of New York involving a variety of claims and counterclaims including breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and false advertising.
  • Represented client involved in Department of Justice investigations and conducted in-depth analyses of key documents and records.
  • Successfully obtained dismissal of tort action against a foreign pharmaceutical company and its subsidiary in state court.
  • Advises clients on Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission guidelines for no-poach and wage fixing agreements, providing guidance on the current legal landscape and best practices for maintaining compliance.
  • Successfully defended pharmaceutical company in action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract.
  • Advised client on settlement terms with the Federal Trade Commission.

 

Recognitions and Memberships

Recognitions

  • Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity (LCLD): Pathfinder (2020)

Memberships

  • New York City Bar Association
  • Asian American Bar Association of New York
    • Young Lawyers Committee: Co-Chair
  • Practicing Attorneys for Law Students Program, Inc.
  • National Asian Pacific American Bar Association
  • American Bar Association: Antitrust Law Section

Pro Bono

  • Advises nonprofit childcare center with various COVID-19 related issues, including navigation through CARES Act provisions.
  • Represented client in an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit seeking withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture.
  • Conducted and defended depositions in various tort actions as public service attorney on behalf of the Law Department of the City of New York.
  • Assisted in drafting of an amicus brief challenging the constitutionality of certain bail bond fees before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Prior Positions

  • The Honorable Joel H. Slomsky, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Judicial Clerk (2017)
  • The Honorable Loren Bailey-Schiffman, New York City Civil Court, Kings County: Judicial Intern (2015)
  • Financial Industry Regulation Authority: Legal Extern, Dispute Resolution (2015)

Admissions

  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
  • New York

Education

  • J.D., New York Law School, 2016; Moot Court Association Executive Board, Vice Chair; Dispute Resolution Team Executive Board, Training Chair; Recipient of the Joseph Solomon Award for Excellent Character and Fitness
  • B.A., Boston University, 2010

Languages

  • Burmese

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Antitrust Advocate
DOJ Takes a Stance on Section 230 Reform that Could Place Additional Burdens on Online Platforms
By Linda A. Goldstein, Jeffrey D. Martino, Darley Maw, Ann M. O'Brien
July 24, 2020
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently outlined proposed reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.[1] Section 230 has been in place since the early days of the Internet and protects online platforms from liability...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Fishy Price Fixing Leads to 40-month Jail Stint
By Darley Maw
June 30, 2020
On June 16, following a monthlong trial, Christopher Lischewski, former CEO and president of Bumble Bee Foods LLC, was sentenced by Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California to 40 months in prison plus a $100,000 fine for...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
1-800 Contacts Settles Class Action Lawsuit With Roots in FTC Action
By Darley Maw, Ann M. O'Brien
May 21, 2020
Back in 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued 1-800 Contacts, claiming the online retailer devised an anticompetitive scheme with other online lens retailers to restrict search terms. The FTC argued that 1-800 Contacts and its...
Read More ->
AD-ttorneys Law Blog
No More Blurry Searches: 1-800 Contacts Settles Class Action Lawsuit Alleging Search Term Restraints
By Darley Maw, Ann M. O'Brien
May 21, 2020
Last week, mega-online retailer 1-800 Contacts settled claims brought by a class action suit in the Central District of Utah alleging that the company was the mastermind of a scheme to prevent competition in the online contact lens market...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Should Antitrust Laws Tackle Privacy Issues? DOJ and State AGs Continue Google Investigations in Response to Privacy Concerns
By Darley Maw
February 28, 2020
Months have passed since it was first revealed in July 2019 that the Department of Justice (DOJ), in response to various stakeholders’ concerns, was conducting a review into certain “market-leading online platforms” and whether they...
Read More ->