Deborah H. Renner

Partner

New York
T +1.212.589.4654
F +1.212.589.4201

Overview

Deborah Renner leads BakerHostetler's class action practice in New York and is a founder and former editor of BakerHostetler's Class Action Lawsuit Defense blog. She also serves as the pro bono coordinator for the New York office and is on the firm's Diversity Committee.

Deborah focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation, including the defense of consumer fraud, data breach, insurance, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and securities class actions. Deborah has successfully defended numerous companies in nationwide, multidistrict and state class actions. She has defeated class certification in courts around the country and has won the dismissal of class claims at the outset of numerous actions. Deborah frequently advises companies on class action defense and regulatory inquiries. She has represented companies facing regulatory inquiries in the data privacy, insurance and securities arenas. Among her areas of knowledge and experience, Deborah is certified in information privacy. She was recently elected to the American Law Institute and the American Bar Foundation. 

Select Experience

  • Representing a New York-based real estate holding company in a putative class action alleging fraud by building owners with respect to New York's rent stabilization laws. 
  • Recently represented a retailer in a threatened class action under New Jersey's Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, obtaining a favorable settlement.
  • Recently represented a company in a Civil Investigative Demand by a state attorney general regarding data privacy and security practices.
More »

Experience

  • Representing a New York-based real estate holding company in a putative class action alleging fraud by building owners with respect to New York's rent stabilization laws. 
  • Recently represented a retailer in a threatened class action under New Jersey's Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notice Act, obtaining a favorable settlement.
  • Recently represented a company in a Civil Investigative Demand by a state attorney general regarding data privacy and security practices.
  • Recently represented a company in a putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
  • Won complete dismissal of a data breach class action. Polanco v. Omnicell, Inc., 988 F. Supp. 2d 451 (D.N.J. 2013).
  • Represented a broker-dealer in an international securities-based class action that settled favorably for the client. Marylebone PCC Limited v. Millennium Global Investments, Ltd., No. 12-cv-3835, slip order (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014). 
  • Obtained or enforced an injunction to stop class litigation: 
    • Marshall v. Capital Growth Co., 2017 WL 921963 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. March 7, 2017).
    • Picard v. Goldman, 546 B.R. 284 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016), aff’d, 2017 WL 383490 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2017).
    • Picard v. Marshall, 511  B.R. 375 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 23, 2014), aff’d, Fox v. Picard, 531 B.R. 345 (S.D.N.Y. May 11, 2015).
    • Picard v. Fox, 429 B.R. 423 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), aff'd, In re Madoff, 848 F. Supp. 2d 469 (S.D.N.Y. 2012), aff'd, 740 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2014).
    • Picard v. Stahl, 443 B.R. 295 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011), aff'd, In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 2011 WL 7981599 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2011), aff'd, The Lautenberg Found. v. Picard, 512 Fed. Appx. 18 (2d Cir. 2013).
    • In re Bernard L. Madoff, 477 B.R. 351 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012), aff'd, 2013 WL 5511027 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2013).
    • Picard v. Maxam Absolute Return Fund, L.P., 460 B.R. 106 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011), aff'd, 474 B.R. 76 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
  • Represented amicus in U.S. Supreme Court supporting petition in Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. v. Pena (Oct. 2017), concerning whether evidence must be admissible for class certification.
  • Represented amicus in U.S. Supreme Court in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez, 136 S. Ct. 663 (Jan. 20, 2016), concerning the use of an offer of judgment in a TCPA case.
  • Represented amicus in U.S. Supreme Court in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, 2016 WL 1092414 (March 22, 2016), dealing with the use of statistics for determining liability and damages and the inclusion of uninjured class members in a class action under Rule 23 or a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • Represented amicus in U.S. Supreme Court in The Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013), holding that named plaintiff's counsel could not use stipulation to avoid federal jurisdiction. 
  • Represented amicus in U.S. Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133 S. Ct. 1426 (2013), holding that named plaintiffs could not rely on a class-wide damages model to obtain class certification.
  • As a lead attorney on the BakerHostetler team serving as counsel to Irving H. Picard, the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA) Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, managed a team of attorneys in Picard v. JPMorgan, which, in 2014, resulted in two settlements totaling $543 million for the SIPA Trustee and class action plaintiffs, and which led to a $1.7 billion forfeiture to the United States Attorney's Office. 
  • Won summary judgment in a putative class action concerning alleged fraud in the pricing of long-term care insurance in an ERISA context. Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co. of America, 622 F. Supp. 2d 755 (N.D. Iowa June 20, 2008), aff'd, 582 F.3d 886 (8th Cir. Sept. 18, 2009).
  • Won the complete dismissal of a securities fraud class action alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Medis Investor Group v. Medis Technologies, Ltd., 586 F. Supp. 2d 136 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd, 2009 WL 2171277 (2d Cir. July 21, 2009).

Recognitions and Memberships

Recognitions

  • New York Metro "Super Lawyer" (2011 to 2017)
    • "Top 50 Women in New York" (2014 to 2015)
  • Immigration Equality Safe Haven Awards: Co-Chair (2017)

Memberships

  • American Law Institute
    • Principles of the Law, Data Privacy: Members Consultative Group
    • Restatement Third, Conflict of Laws: Members Consultative Group
  • American Bar Foundation: Member
  • American Bar Association, Section of Litigation Class Action and Derivative Suits 
  • International Association of Privacy Professionals
    • Certified Information Privacy Professional (U.S.)
  • Brooklyn Bar Association, Volunteer Lawyers Project: Advisory Board
  • Defense Research Institute, Appellate Advocacy Section

News

News

Pro Bono

  • In 2017, represented 53 companies in an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in Gloucester Co. School Bd. v. Grimm, arguing in favor of the rights of transgender students.
  • Frequently works with Immigration Equality, helping gay, lesbian, transgender and HIV-positive individuals gain asylum in the United States.

Featured Video

Deborah Renner comments on Amgen vs. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Play Video

Prior Positions

  • Fordham University Law School: Adjunct Assistant Professor of Class Action Law (2002 to 2006)

Admissions

  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2008
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 2001
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 2008
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, 1993
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, 1993
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, 2003
  • U.S. Supreme Court, 1997
  • New York, 1993
  • District of Columbia, 1994
  • New Jersey, 2014

Education

  • J.D., Harvard Law School, 1992, cum laude
  • M.A., Princeton University, 1987
  • B.A., Johns Hopkins University, 1984, with honors

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Federal Authorities Continue to Monitor Proposed Class Action Settlements
By Douglas A. Vonderhaar
April 18, 2018
Officials at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) continue to scrutinize class settlements to ensure that neither defendants nor class action counsel are improperly benefiting at the expense of class...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
D.C. Circuit vacates FCC's definition of ATDS but upholds consent-revocation rule in ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission
By Sam Camardo
March 29, 2018
In 2015, the FTC issued an order that addressed certain aspects of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Congress enacted the TCPA in 1991 to address perceived abuses of telephone equipment that allowed entities to autodial consumers’...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Supremes Hold SLUSA Is Clear – 33 Act Class Claims Stay in State Court
By Cody S. Wigington
March 22, 2018
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, handed class action plaintiffs a victory by holding that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA) allows them to pursue alleged violations of the...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Ninth Circuit Vacates Final Approval of National Settlement Class Action Certification
March 5, 2018
Last month, the Ninth Circuit vacated the certification of a nationwide class for settlement in the In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Economy Litigation, No. 15-56014, 881 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 2018). The Ninth Circuit concluded that the...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
The Fourth Circuit Refuses to Enforce Arbitration Clause and Class Action Waiver in Employment Contracts
February 21, 2018
As we have previously written, several Supreme Court decisions have upheld, in various contexts, arbitration agreements that waive the right to assert claims on a class basis. See, e.g., AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333...
Read More ->