Alerts

2016 Class Action Year-End Review

Alerts / March 30, 2017

We are pleased to share BakerHostetler’s 2016 Class Action Year-End Review, which offers a summary of key developments in class action litigation during the past year. Class action litigation moved to the forefront of the Supreme Court’s docket in 2016 and promises to remain there in 2017, as class action doctrine continues to evolve in federal and state courts.

This comprehensive analysis of last year’s developments in class action procedure and jurisdiction, as well as developments by subject matter, will provide context and insight into expected trends in class action law as you look ahead to 2017. We hope you find this review a useful tool.

The 2016 Class Action Year-End Review is a joint project of our class action defense, antitrust and competition, privacy and data protection, securities litigation and regulatory enforcement, appellate and major motions, and employment class actions teams, and is the fruit of collaborative efforts of numerous attorneys across the firm.

Video: Class Action Trends: What to Expect in 2017

Class action defense team leader Paul Karlsgodt discusses some important things trending this year.

For updates throughout the year, please be sure to visit the blogs sponsored by each of these teams: Class Action Lawsuit Defense, Antitrust Advocate, Data Privacy Monitor and Employment Class Action Blog.

The Review is edited by Sam Camardo and Dustin M. Dow. Contributing writers are Alexa E. Craig, Zachariah J. DeMeola, Rodger L. EckelberryBlythe G. Kochsiek, Jessica L. Greenberg, Xakema L. Henderson, Paul G. Karlsgodt, David M. McMillan, James R. Morrison, Matthew D. Pearson, Anthony B. Ponikvar, Douglas L. Shively, Sammantha J. Tillotson, Josephine Tung and Carrie A. Valdez.


Baker & Hostetler LLP publications are intended to inform our clients and other friends of the firm about current legal developments of general interest. They should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act upon the information contained in these publications without professional counsel. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you written information about our qualifications and experience.

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Antitrust Advocate
Join Us for a Teleconference on New ABA Publication, “Antitrust Class Actions Handbook”
February 20, 2018
The ABA recently released a new publication that should be of interest to antitrust practitioners, the Antitrust Class Actions Handbook, Second Edition. The Handbook comprehensively addresses issues that arise before, during and after the...
Read More ->
Data Privacy Monitor
Recent OCR Newsletter Highlights Growing Cyber Extortion Threat for Healthcare Organizations
February 19, 2018
The OCR’s January 2018 newsletter details specific types of cyber extortion that healthcare organizations are currently encountering, including ransomware, denial of service attacks, distributed denial of service attacks and theft of...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Courts Deny Certification for Adequacy of Representation in Second Class Action
February 16, 2018
One of the tactics in the current plaintiffs’ wage and hour playbook is to bring a second claim after settlement of an initial class or collective action lawsuit. In these cases, the second set of claims is purportedly brought on behalf of...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
No Health Care Merger Too Small for the FTC to Take an Antitrust Look
February 12, 2018
In our November and December 2016 articles, we discussed the Federal Trade Commission’s proclivity to challenge health care mergers, even when the purported anticompetitive effects of the relatively economically limited merger would be...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Faulty Statistics Lead to Decertification of California Wage and Hour Case
February 9, 2018
Nearly four years ago, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Duran v. U.S. Bank National Ass’n, 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014), in which it virtually catalogued the many problems inherent in the plaintiffs’ statistical case...
Read More ->