Alerts

BakerHostetler 2014 Year-End Review of Class Actions (and what to expect in 2015)

Alerts / February 2, 2015

We are pleased to share with you the BakerHostetler 2014 Year-End Review of Class Actions, which offers a summary of some of the key developments in class action litigation during the past year. Class action litigation continues to persist in all areas of civil litigation, and the doctrines governing class action disputes came under particular scrutiny at all levels of the judiciary, both federal and state, in 2014—a trend that appears poised to continue in 2015. Following in the footsteps of an active Supreme Court in 2013, lower federal courts spent much of 2014 identifying and filling in doctrinal gaps that will shape class litigation for the foreseeable future.

We hope you find this Review a useful tool as you move forward into the new year. This comprehensive analysis of last year's developments in class action procedure and jurisdiction, as well as developments by subject matter will hopefully provide context and insight as you look ahead to 2015's expected trends in class action law, including the increasing emphasis on fine-tuning class certification requirements, the continued proliferation of employment and privacy class action litigation, and the impact of certiorari denials that leave in place landscape-shifting lower court decisions.

The Review is a joint project of the firm's Class Action Defense, Antitrust and Competition, Privacy and Data Protection, Securities Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement, Appellate and Major Motions, and Employment Class Actions practice teams and is the fruit of collaborative efforts of numerous attorneys from across the firm.

For updates throughout the year, please be sure to visit the blogs sponsored by each of these practice teams:

Authorship Credit: Andrew W. Alexander, Sam Camardo, Dustin M. Dow, Jonathon Korinko, Jacqueline K. Matthews, Elliot Morrison, Mark Norris, Andrew E. Samuels, and Ann Yackshaw.

Dustin M. Dow edited the Review.


Baker & Hostetler LLP publications are intended to inform our clients and other friends of the firm about current legal developments of general interest. They should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act upon the information contained in these publications without professional counsel. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you written information about our qualifications and experience.

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
Eleventh Circuit Stands Firm – No Incentive Awards for Class Representatives
August 12, 2022
Nearly two years after it issued its initial decision in Johnson v. NPAS Sols., LLC, in which it held incentive awards for class representatives to be per se unlawful, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied a...
Read More ->
Data Counsel
NYDFS Proposed Amendments to Its Cybersecurity Rules
August 9, 2022
On July 29, the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) released Draft Amendments to its Part 500 Cybersecurity Rules that include a number of significant amendments to the rules, including notification requirements such as a...
Read More ->
Data Counsel
‘Unboxing' the New NIST Guidance: NIST Publishes Significant Update to Healthcare Cybersecurity Guide
By Adam I. Cohen, Kimberly C. Gordy, Aleksandra Vold
August 5, 2022
Without question, healthcare providers and the companies that support them operate in an elevated cybersecurity risk environment. And when a cybersecurity incident occurs, the ensuing regulatory inquiries and/or litigation often focus on...
Read More ->
Data Counsel
Florida Follows North Carolina in Prohibiting State Agencies from Paying Ransoms
By Elise R. Elam, Benjamin D. Wanger
July 19, 2022
We recently wrote about North Carolina’s new law prohibiting state agencies – including public schools and universities – from paying a ransom or even communicating with a threat actor following a ransomware incident. On June 24, Florida...
Read More ->
Data Counsel
HHS OCR Guidance to 60,000 Retail Pharmacies: Refusal to Fill Rx Based on Potential Pregnancy Termination Concerns Is a Civil Rights Violation, Will Be Investigated
By Kimberly C. Gordy, Aleksandra Vold
July 18, 2022
On July 13, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued guidance to retail pharmacies that refusing to dispense a prescribed medication or making a determination on the suitability of that...
Read More ->