Alerts

Financial Services 2016 Year-End Report

Alerts / March 1, 2017

Welcome to the 2016 Year-End Report from BakerHostetler’s Financial Services Industry Team. We are pleased to share our analysis of some of the key legal developments in the financial services industry in the past year and our expectations for 2017. Please contact any of the team members listed at the end of this report if you have questions or would like additional information on these or other issues as they unfold in the coming months.

The significant developments from the past year we focus on in this Report include:

  • Cybersecurity, which cemented its position as the predominant concern for industry and for regulators.
  • FinTech innovation and investment, which continued at a blistering pace as regulators and lawmakers accelerated efforts to avoid being left too far behind.
  • The promise of distributed ledger technologies and blockchain technology projects, which have captured the imagination of many in industry and government and present unique legal and regulatory issues.
  • The fate of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in the face of litigation and in the wake of the elections.
  • The CFPB’s ongoing efforts to promulgate new regulations, issue regulatory guidance, establish precedents in enforcement actions, order restitution and collect fines.
  • The end of the prepaid card industry’s long wait for the CFPB’s final, controversial regulation, but the uncertain future of the rule in the face of potential congressional repeal or amendment and other challenges that are emerging for the industry.
  • Beneficial ownership, unquestionably the anti-money laundering (AML) topic of the year, with new customer due diligence regulations finalized, the release of the Panama Papers and the largest asset seizure under the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Rewards Act to date.
  • State agency regulatory initiatives and enforcement actions in nonbank lending and state money transmitter licensing.
  • Companies in the energy sector continuing to dominate in corporate bankruptcy filing.

The Report also offers insight regarding trends and emerging issues, with a watchful eye on the activities of the new administration and Congress. Few in the industry anticipated the potential scope of change we have already seen in many areas of financial services law in 2017. Even for those practicing in the highly dynamic field of FinTech, it was surprising that major legislative and regulatory initiatives over the past 20, 30 or even 40 years could be upended in a matter of weeks or months.

We hope that you use our analysis and first predictions on what may be ahead for 2017 to navigate what is likely to be an unprecedented year of change.

For periodic updates throughout what we expect to be a busy year, please visit the Financial Services Blog and the blogs sponsored by other practice teams, including the Class Action Lawsuit Defense and the Data Privacy Monitor blogs.

View the Financial Services 2016 Year-End Report.

Authorship credit: Brett A. Wall, Carol R. Van Cleef, Keesha N. Warmsby, Karl Fanter, Joel C. Griswold, Patrick T. Lewis, Gina M. Mavica, Dennis W. Russo, Melonia A. Bennett, Marissa L. Black, Sam Camardo, Lauren M. Hilsheimer, Joel D. Gottesman, Michael Iannuzzi, Elyssa S. Kates, Robert S. Niemi, Anthony B. Ponikvar and Douglas A. Vonderhaar


Baker & Hostetler LLP publications are intended to inform our clients and other friends of the firm about current legal developments of general interest. They should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act upon the information contained in these publications without professional counsel. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you written information about our qualifications and experience.

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Data Privacy Monitor
US Companies Create Principles for Cybersecurity Risk Ratings
June 22, 2017
On June 20, 2017, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce announced that a consortium of more than two dozen chamber member companies, including prominent big banks, big-box retailers, and technology giants released a set of principles designed to...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
District of New Jersey Further Defines the Evolving Boundaries of Injury-in-Fact After Spokeo
June 21, 2017
On June 6, 2017, in Kamal v. J. Crew Grp, Inc., No. CV 2:15-0190, 2017 WL 2443062 (D.N.J. June 6, 2017), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed a plaintiff’s second attempt to assert a claim for...
Read More ->
Data Privacy Monitor
When is a Chair not a Chair? Big Data Algorithms, Disparate Impact, and Considerations of Modular Programming
June 19, 2017
The DESI VII Workshop titled “Using Advanced Data Analysis in eDiscovery & Related Disciplines to Identify and Protect Sensitive Information in Large Collections” was held on the Strand Campus of King’s College in London on June 12, 2017...
Read More ->
Class Action Lawsuit Defense
DC Circuit Denies Intervenors’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc After Striking Down FCC Regulations Requiring Opt-out Notifications on Solicited Fax Advertisements
June 13, 2017
On March 31, 2017, the D.C. Circuit struck down FCC regulations requiring that solicited fax advertisements include opt-out notifications, holding that the TCPA did not grant the FCC the authority to impose such a requirement when, by its...
Read More ->
Data Privacy Monitor
Deeper Dive: Clapper Divide Expands In Data Breach Cases
June 13, 2017
As reported in our 2017 Data Security Incident Response Report, plaintiffs allege potential future harm as a basis for injury in 80 percent of data breach lawsuits. But are allegations of future harm sufficient to meet Article III’s...
Read More ->