Alerts

The BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter

Alerts / July 19, 2018

Welcome to the first edition of The BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter. We are pleased to share our analysis of some of the key employment trends that affected New York employers in 2017, and our expectations for 2018. Please contact Amy J. Traub, whose information is listed at the end of the newsletter, if you have questions or would like additional information on these or other issues as they unfold in the coming months.

In this newsletter, we focus on the following significant developments from the past year:

  • Predictable Schedules a Right, Not a Privilege, in NYC Fast-Food and Retail Industries
  • The Second Circuit Finds Title VII Protects Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination
  • New York Institutes Paid Family Leave
  • Supreme Court Upholds Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements as Valid and Enforceable
  • In New York, Employers Are Now Responsible for Harassment of Nonemployees
  • New York City Expands Paid Sick Leave Law With Creation of ‘Safe Time’
  • As of July 1, 2018, New Jersey Has One of the Most Employee-Friendly Equal Pay Laws in the Country
  • New York State Anti-Harassment Measures Passed in the 2019 Budget Bill Begin to Take Effect
  • Anti-Sexual Harassment Policies and Training
  • Prohibition on Mandatory Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims Begins July 11
  • Limitations on Nondisclosure Agreements Related to Sexual Harassment Claims, Which Began on July 11
  • New York City to Follow in New York State’s Footsteps
  • New Jersey Adopts a Statewide Paid Sick Leave Act
  • More Scheduling Accommodations Required by New NYC Law Taking Effect July 18
  • New York State Scheduling Regulations

We hope that you use our analysis and forecasts for the rest of 2018 to help you navigate what is likely to be a year of unprecedented change.

For updates throughout the year, please visit the Employment Law Spotlight blog and the blogs sponsored by other practice teams, including the Employment Class Action Report blog.

Authorship credit: Amy J. Traub – Editor, Shawn N. Butte, Tracy Cole, Fanny A. Ferdman, Paul Rosenberg, Saima Z. Sheikh, Amanda Van Hoose Garofalo.

Baker & Hostetler LLP publications are intended to inform our clients and other friends of the firm about current legal developments of general interest. They should not be construed as legal advice, and readers should not act upon the information contained in these publications without professional counsel. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you written information about our qualifications and experience.

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Employment Class Action Blog
Coinbase Inc. v. Bielski – Supreme Court Holds Oral Argument on the Issue of Whether an Interlocutory Appeal of the Denial of a Motion To Compel Arbitration Stays the Case
March 24, 2023
The Coinbase case involves a joint petition for writ of certiorari that could have a major impact on motions to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, Case No. 22-105 (oral argument Mar. 21...
Read More ->
Employment Law Spotlight
Ten Things That Should Be in Your Staffing Agency Agreements But Probably Aren't
By Todd H. Lebowitz
March 13, 2023
Retaining temporary labor can be convenient for your business, but the retention introduces new legal risks. Under a joint employment theory, your company can be 100% legally liable for errors made by a staffing agency. You could be sued...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Supreme Court Adopts Strict Construction of Salaried Test, Even for Highly Paid Exempt Employees
By Gregory V. Mersol
February 22, 2023
One relatively common misapprehension by employers is that generous wages or popular methods of payment will satisfy the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). On February 22, 2023, the Supreme Court reiterated the need not simply for “fair”...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Illinois Supreme Court: Sections 15(b) and 15(d) BIPA Claims Accrue with Each Scan or Transmission
February 17, 2023
Today the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision in Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc. 2023 IL 128004, in which the court held that the statute of limitations accrues with each scan or transmission of biometric identifiers or biometric...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Illinois Supreme Court: 5-Year Statute of Limitations for BIPA Claims
February 2, 2023
Earlier today, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a decision in Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc., 2023 IL 127801, in which the court held that a five-year statute of limitations applies to all claims arising under the Illinois Biometric...
Read More ->