Articles

Allen Sokal Analyzes Federal Circuit Judge Bryson's Decision on Conflict Issue

Articles / March 17, 2016

Counsel Allen Sokal authored an article published March 14, 2016, in IP Frontline. The article, “Federal Circuit Judge Bryson Denies Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff’s Counsel,” analyzes a recent decision in the Eastern District of Texas. The issue revolved around Fish & Richardson’s representation of Uropep against co-defendant Brookshire Brothers, Inc. Fish & Richardson represented Brookshire Brothers in a previous patent infringement suit, and Brookshire had moved to disqualify the firm. Federal Circuit Judge William Bryson denied the motion, citing the limits of the original engagement letter and applying Texas and ABA Rules of Professional Conduct. The article originally appeared on the IP Intelligence blog.

Read the article.

Related Services

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems: Attaching Security Profile to a Downloadable Is Patent Eligible
January 16, 2018
In Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered a decision containing interesting rulings on patentable subject matter (affirming the District Court determination that certain claims were patent...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit Finds Lanham Act Clause Banning Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks Unconstitutional
January 9, 2018
On December 15, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down as unconstitutional the clause within 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a) (“Section 2(a)”) banning registration of a trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral…or...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Patent Portfolio Management – a Team Approach to Patent Drafting
January 8, 2018
On my drive to work, there was a trash bag on the freeway, then a box, and later a couple of bags flying around. I wondered where this garbage came from. There were a number of likely candidates: a small pickup truck loaded with...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Strategic Use of a Reissue Application in the Context of an Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding
January 2, 2018
In Legend3D, Inc. (Petitioner) v. Prime Focus Creative Services Canada Inc. (Patent Owner), Case IPR2016-00806, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) lifted a stay of a pending reissue application following a Final Written Decision...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Joint Infringement Standard
December 27, 2017
In Travel Sentry, Inc. v. Tropp, Appeal No. 16-2386 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017),[1] the Federal Circuit clarified the scope of joint infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).[2] Specifically, the court provided guidance on performing analysis...
Read More ->