Danyll Foix Article Explains Why "Failing Firm" Defense Could Not Save Waste Companies' Deal

Articles / August 22, 2017

Partner Danyll Foix authored an analysis published by Law360 on July 19, 2017. The article, “The ‘Failing Firm’ Defense: Pointers from a Blocked Deal,” offers insight into the failed deal between EnergySolutions and Waste Control Specialists. A federal judge ruled that the terms of the acquisition agreement precluded the parties from relying on the “failing firm” defense to save the deal from being blocked on antitrust grounds.

Foix’s article discusses the deal and the “failed firm” arguments, and concludes:

“The blocked EnergySolutions/WCS merger provides a few pointers for parties considering acquisitions that are likely to draw scrutiny from antitrust enforcers. Most obviously, parties that anticipate relying on a failing firm defense should avoid transaction provisions that hinder a thorough, good-faith process for identifying potential buyers. This does not mean that parties cannot agree to exclusive negotiation, or no-talk, terms. Rather, such terms may be adopted after completing a process that confirms the lack of reasonable alternative buyers for a failing firm. And if that is not possible, the parties still may be able to prove there were no alternative buyers through post-transaction evidence or cooperation with the enforcers.”

Read the article (registration required).


In The Blogs

Previous Next
Antitrust Advocate
DOJ Now Targeting HR Professionals for Criminal Antitrust Violations
By Tyson Y. Herrold, Carl W. Hittinger
April 9, 2018
Partner Carl Hittinger and Associate Tyson Herrold authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on March 30, 2018. The article, “DOJ Now Targeting HR Professionals for Criminal Antitrust Violations,” examines the Department of...
Antitrust Advocate
The Department of Justice Weighs In on the Application of North Carolina Dental Examiners to the Florida State Bar
By William DeVinney
March 23, 2018
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently took the uncommon step of submitting an amicus brief to weigh in on a motion to dismiss. TIKD Services, LLC v. The Florida Bar, No. 1:17-cv-24103 (S.D. Fla. filed Nov. 8, 2017), Dkt. 115...
Antitrust Advocate
Should a Judge’s Personal Judicial Experience Affect Antitrust Pleadings?
March 19, 2018
When the U.S. Supreme Court scrapped Conley v. Gibson’s “no set of facts” federal pleading standard in Twombly (2007) and Iqbal (2009), courts initially struggled to apply the inherently ambiguous “plausibility” standard. In the immediate...
Antitrust Advocate
Join Us for a Teleconference on New ABA Publication, “Antitrust Class Actions Handbook”
February 20, 2018
The ABA recently released a new publication that should be of interest to antitrust practitioners, the Antitrust Class Actions Handbook, Second Edition. The Handbook comprehensively addresses issues that arise before, during and after the...
Antitrust Advocate
No Health Care Merger Too Small for the FTC to Take an Antitrust Look
February 12, 2018
In our November and December 2016 articles, we discussed the Federal Trade Commission’s proclivity to challenge health care mergers, even when the purported anticompetitive effects of the relatively economically limited merger would be...