Articles

Danyll Foix Article Explains Why "Failing Firm" Defense Could Not Save Waste Companies' Deal

Articles / August 22, 2017

Partner Danyll Foix authored an analysis published by Law360 on July 19, 2017. The article, “The ‘Failing Firm’ Defense: Pointers from a Blocked Deal,” offers insight into the failed deal between EnergySolutions and Waste Control Specialists. A federal judge ruled that the terms of the acquisition agreement precluded the parties from relying on the “failing firm” defense to save the deal from being blocked on antitrust grounds.

Foix’s article discusses the deal and the “failed firm” arguments, and concludes:


“The blocked EnergySolutions/WCS merger provides a few pointers for parties considering acquisitions that are likely to draw scrutiny from antitrust enforcers. Most obviously, parties that anticipate relying on a failing firm defense should avoid transaction provisions that hinder a thorough, good-faith process for identifying potential buyers. This does not mean that parties cannot agree to exclusive negotiation, or no-talk, terms. Rather, such terms may be adopted after completing a process that confirms the lack of reasonable alternative buyers for a failing firm. And if that is not possible, the parties still may be able to prove there were no alternative buyers through post-transaction evidence or cooperation with the enforcers.”

Read the article (registration required).

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Antitrust Advocate
Ohio v. American Express: The Supreme Court Credits American Express’s Anti-Steering Provisions
July 10, 2018
In a 5-4 decision in Ohio v. American Express, the Supreme Court affirmed that the anti-steering provisions of American Express’s merchant agreement do not violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Credit card companies’ core business involves...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Carl Hittinger, Tyson Herrold Author Article that Assesses Congressional Attempts to Update FTC Merger Review Process
By Tyson Y. Herrold, Carl W. Hittinger
June 27, 2018
Partner Carl Hittinger and Associate Tyson Herrold authored an article published June 22, 2018, by The Legal Intelligencer. The article, “How Smart is the Proposed Merger Review SMARTER Act?,” discusses a long-awaited bill before Congress...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Did You Know the ‘Plausibility' Standard Can Be Used for More Than Pleading Antitrust Claims?
By Danyll W. Foix
June 26, 2018
Partners Robert Abrams, Gregory Commins, and Danyll Foix authored an article published in the Global Competition Review’s “The Antitrust Review of the Americas 2018.” Their article reviews how the “plausibility” pleading standard announced...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
Class Actions Now Flowing From FTC and DOJ's No-Poach Enforcement
By Tyson Y. Herrold, Carl W. Hittinger
May 15, 2018
Partner Carl Hittinger and Associate Tyson Herrold authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on May 5, 2018. The article, “Class Actions Now Flowing from FTC and DOJ’s No-Poach Enforcement,” discusses the increase of class...
Read More ->
Antitrust Advocate
DOJ Now Targeting HR Professionals for Criminal Antitrust Violations
By Tyson Y. Herrold, Carl W. Hittinger
April 9, 2018
Partner Carl Hittinger and Associate Tyson Herrold authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on March 30, 2018. The article, “DOJ Now Targeting HR Professionals for Criminal Antitrust Violations,” examines the Department of...
Read More ->