Articles

James Sherer, Kevin Wallace Co-Author Article on Additional New Technology Due Diligence Procedures for Richmond Journal of Law & Technology

Articles / March 8, 2016

Counsel James Sherer and Associate Kevin Wallace are among the co-authors of an article published in the Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, Volume XXII, Issue 2, in February 2016. The article, titled “Merger and Acquisition Due Diligence Part II—The Devil in the Details,” examines the current practices of various counselors and third-party service providers within evolving due diligence practices. The article specifically addresses how attorneys and service providers may incorporate new technologies—and considerations of new technologies—into the traditional deal framework, stating that:

There is room—and a need—for multiple areas of expertise in the Deal context, and Deal work is often tailored according to the specific needs of the transaction. Attorneys should provide legal advice on issues and risks that will impact the value of a Deal, not just in the traditional areas of inquiry but also addressing DP, IS and e-Discovery—and service providers have developed the technology and strategies in other contexts to provide counsel with the information they need in these non-traditional areas to value the Deal in a cost effective and efficient manner.

Utilizing and relaying the results from a novel survey of third-party service providers, the article then discusses what services are currently supplied in this emerging area. Finally, the article concludes that there is still room for both additional thought leadership as well as service-provider services, and gives some thoughts on how this practice may advance in the future.

Read the full article.

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Discovery Advocate
Why Aren’t You Using FRE 502(d)
December 18, 2017
In 2008, Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) was signed and enacted into law by Congress to minimize the cost of civil litigation, particularly in matters with large volumes of ESI. The intent of the rule is to allow parties to produce large...
Read More ->
Discovery Advocate
It's the End of Authentication (of ESI) as We Know It
By Carey S. Busen
November 29, 2017
Amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence 803 and 902 will become effective on Dec. 1 and will “govern in all proceedings thereafter commenced and, insofar as just, all proceedings then pending.” We previously analyzed the changes to the...
Read More ->
Discovery Advocate
Cost Shifting Ordered Due to Inadequate Meet and Confer
By Nichole L. Sterling
July 26, 2017
Discovery is not about gamesmanship, and parties are expected to engage in meaningful negotiation about the terms of discovery agreements. That is the message from Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson of the Eastern District of New York, who...
Read More ->
Discovery Advocate
E-Discovery Standards and the 26(g) Signature That Drives the Market
By James A. Sherer
July 10, 2017
We begin with three quick questions: 1. Which legal practice has created and fueled a multibillion-dollar support industry? 2. Which legal practice employs incomprehensible acronyms that require a glossary apart from Black’s Law...
Read More ->
Discovery Advocate
Attorneys’ Professional Duty of Care When Representing Clients in Litigation or an Investigation Requires Higher Technological Literacy
By May Tal Gongolevsky
June 14, 2017
The legal practice and technology go hand in hand, and a solid understanding of technology is crucial to satisfy the ethical duties owed by attorneys to their clients. In an opinion published on Feb. 21, the New York County Lawyers...
Read More ->