Events

Philadelphia Event: Will Nationwide Venue for Patent Infringement Suits Soon End?

Events / Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2017
Noon - 1:45 p.m. EST

BakerHostetler
Cira Centre, 12th Floor
2929 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

The American Bar Association and BakerHostetler invite you to attend a continuing legal education seminar. Facilitated by Gary Levin and John Murphy, this roundtable will explore the evolution of nationwide venue in patent infringement suits.

Specific topics to be discussed include:

  • Historical review of patent venue decisions, focusing on VE Holding Corp.
  • The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in TC Heartland and potential for Supreme Court review.
  • Is there a justification for determining venue differently for patent actions than for other civil actions?
  • Should the recent concentration of patent cases in a few jurisdictions affect venue rules?
  • Proposed legislative reform to redefine venue for patent actions.

1.5 hours of CLE credit pending.

RSVP by Feb. 21.

RSVP now >>

For questions, contact Dan Greenspan at 215.564.6525.

Event Details

DATE
  • Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2017
TIME
  • Noon to 12:15 p.m. - Registration and lunch.

Lunch will be provided.

  • 12:15 to 1:45 p.m. - Roundtable discussion
VENUE

BakerHostetler
Cira Centre, 12th Floor
2929 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit Splits on Approach to Analyzing Graham Factors
November 6, 2017
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc.,[1] the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the asserted claims of Merck’s U.S. Patent No. 6,486,150 (the ’150 patent) were obvious despite evidence of commercial success and...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
The Federal Circuit Provides a Tutorial on Patent Venue
By Allen M. Sokal
September 27, 2017
The Federal Circuit in In re Cray, Inc., Appeal No. 2017-129 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2017), has provided extensive guidance to district courts on the meaning of an alleged infringer’s “regular and established place of business” under the...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Intellectual Ventures v. Motorola: Use = Benefit for the Purposes of System Claims Infringement
September 21, 2017
On Sept. 13, 2017, the United States District Court for the Federal Circuit clarified the meaning of the term “use” as it applies to system claims in patent infringement actions. In doing so, the court held that an infringer must benefit...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
A Cautionary Tale: IPR Petition Denied Based on Third-Party Submission
August 30, 2017
In Cultec, Inc. v. StormTech LLC, IPR2017-00777, Paper 7 (Aug. 22, 2017), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) denied an inter partes review because the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were said to have been...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit’s Concern Regarding PTAB ‘Panel-Stacking’ – Back To The Future?
August 29, 2017
In Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15923, Circuit Judge Dyk, in a concurring opinion joined by Circuit Judge Wallace, questioned “whether the practice of expanding panels where the PTO is...
Read More ->