Skip to Main Content

The BakerHostetler legal team is very knowledgeable and experienced … We see no weaknesses in the team.

— Chambers USA

BakerHostetler’s Antitrust and Competition team advises and represents clients in their most significant antitrust, competition and consumer protection matters across the U.S. and around the world. From high-stakes litigation and government investigations to complex transactions and strategic counseling, our antitrust attorneys help clients navigate the full spectrum of competition issues with practical, business-focused solutions designed to achieve their objectives and manage risk.

Clients turn to us to handle their most challenging matters, including bet-the-company litigation, criminal and civil government investigations, merger reviews, monopolization claims, class actions and complex commercial disputes involving competition issues. Our antitrust attorneys bring deep experience before the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), State Attorneys General and other authorities across the globe, enabling us to provide sophisticated advice informed by an understanding of regulatory priorities, enforcement trends and litigation strategy.

Our integrated practice advises clients across the full scope and life cycle of antitrust and competition issues, including:

  • Civil antitrust litigation
  • Federal and state government investigations and enforcement actions
  • Criminal antitrust investigations, grand jury proceedings and trials
  • Business recovery and plaintiff-side antitrust litigation
  • Mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures
  • International competition issues
  • Intellectual property and healthcare
  • Compliance programs, audits and training

Additionally, we are one of the few antitrust groups in the country that successfully handles large-scale class action antitrust matters, including taking those cases through trial and appeal.

A Strong Team of Antitrust Attorneys

The strength of our practice is reflected in our team. With more than 50 antitrust attorneys nationwide, we include former senior officials and attorneys from the DOJ, the FTC, State Attorneys General offices and other enforcement agencies. This experience provides clients with valuable insight into how regulators evaluate transactions, conduct investigations and litigate antitrust cases.

Recognized by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, Global Competition Review and other legal accolades, BakerHostetler’s Antitrust and Competition team is known for delivering strategic counsel, rigorous advocacy and practical solutions in the most complex and consequential competition matters.

Our team’s practice areas include the following, among others.


  • Represent one of the largest defendants in litigation concerning RealPage’s revenue management software in nationwide class actions and State Attorneys General actions alleging a Sherman Act Section 1 conspiracy in the use of analytic software in the purported residential real estate market.
  • Represent a national broadcaster in multidistrict antitrust litigation in one of the largest MDLs in the country where plaintiffs allege a conspiracy to inflate local TV ad prices.
  • Obtained a motion to dismiss with no subsequent appeal in representing a top-ranked private research university in a putative antitrust class action brought by students with noncustodial parents against 40 of the nation’s top private universities and the College Board, alleging that defendants conspired to artificially lower the amount of financial aid offered to them.
  • Represent a nationwide mortgage lender in a case involving mortgage pricing analytics software sold by Optimal Blue, where allegations involve claims that mortgage pricing analytics and data tools enabled unlawful information sharing.
  • Represented a corporate client in connection with DOJ alleged price-fixing investigation regarding the use of analytic software. No charges were brought against the client.
  • Represented the largest Roll-On Roll-Off car carrier in the DOJ investigation into Ocean Shipping Services for cars and trucks; obtained the lowest criminal fines and fewest carve-outs among top carriers.
  • Represented a global shipping company in nationwide class actions alleging violations of the Sherman Act and related Federal Maritime Commission proceedings, obtaining rulings that barred plaintiffs’ Sherman Act recoveries and concluding the proceedings without any recovery from our clients.
  • Represented a Japanese company in connection with a global antitrust price-fixing investigation (DOJ, JFTC, KFTC and EU). No charges were brought against the client.
  • Represented a former healthcare company CEO in the first-ever criminal “no-poach” market allocation case. Served as trial counsel and, following an eight-day jury trial, the client was acquitted on all counts. US v. DaVita & Thiry, 21-cr-229 (District of Colorado).
  • Secured summary judgment for an energy company in putative direct- and indirect-purchaser class actions alleging price fixing under the Sherman Act and California’s Cartwright Act. Plaintiffs sought $15 billion in damages before trebling, and the court rejected the claims in a 103-page opinion.
  • Represented Zero Water in an antitrust case against Brita and its parent company Clorox alleging violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, for monopolization of pour-through water filtration systems connected to Brita and Clorox’s alleged failure to disclose a standard essential patent to a standard-setting organization and other industry participants in the standard-setting process. Case settled on favorable terms for our client, Zero Water. Zero Water v. Brita & Clorox.
  • Represented dairy farmers and retailers in a multi-district class-action lawsuit in the Eastern District of Tennessee where our clients accused major processors such as Dean Foods and Dairy Farmers of America of conspiring to fix raw milk prices and restrict competition in the Southeast U.S., leading to settlements exceeding $300 million and significant business practice changes. In re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation.
  • Represented Findaway World LLC in a second-request merger investigation by the DOJ Antitrust Division. The division cleared the matter without seeking any remedy. Our successful resolution of the matter allowed the client to complete the acquisition and Spotify to accelerate its entry into the audiobook retail market.
  • Represented a large U.S. power company in the antitrust aspects of its $18 billion merger with a major competitor. Our work involved responding to the second request from the DOJ, as well as additional reviews by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and State Attorneys General, with these administrative investigations being successfully resolved with government approval, allowing the deal to close.

Featured Insights