Media Law and Digital Content

Overview

As the media industry undergoes rapid transformation, the evolving world of media law becomes ever more challenging to anyone who publishes or shares information. BakerHostetler’s media law legacy goes back nearly 100 years, giving us unparralleled experience that results in continued precedent-setting victories today.

Clients, ranging from newspapers and electronic media that publish nationally to digital providers whose information and potential for legal action go viral in seconds, turn to us to resolve the toughest cases in the field, including those on the cutting edge of adapting media and libel law to the realities of the online information age.

We use our experience to go beyond precedent in order to shape and advance the state of law for the long-term interests of the communications industry, winning hundreds of cases on summary judgment, at trial, or on appeal. We have represented world-class authors such as President Bill Clinton, and won copyright infringement and libel cases on behalf of novelist John Grisham, Barbara Bush, and other noted authors. We also succeeded in the seminal New York Times case that extended opinion protection to book reviews.

Our attorneys help clients navigate digital distribution as it creates new legal ramifications for copyright, privacy, intellectual property, and libel law, especially with the advent of social media, comments and other third-party content. For example, in Shirley Sherrod v. Andrew Breitbart, et al., we are defending a blogger accused of posting deceptively edited content online. We also are representing the defendant in a defamation action in one of the first cases to tackle the issue of reasonable expectation of privacy when a website repurposes and comments on photos posted on Facebook. We were among the first attorneys to question whether the special vernacular and content of the Internet should be governed by the same law that controls language in traditional media.

More »

The Internet offers our clients limitless opportunities to engage in e-commerce transactions and to distribute information and creative content. Our experienced team of lawyers also assists in developing Internet platforms and negotiating agreements for Internet sales and distribution, information services and computer games. We negotiate agreements for Internet content, service providers, and for the distribution of web-based content and programs. We regularly structure and negotiate linking, licensing, and service provider agreements.

Clients, including the major TV networks, newspapers and book publishers, benefit from our nationwide roster of media and intellectual property attorneys, many of whom have deeper appreciation of the issues due to their experience as former reporters and producers. We represent media clients in matters related to civil rights, news-gathering, reporter’s privilege, copyright and syndicated licensing, intellectual property, privacy, responding to subpoenas, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Our interdisciplinary approach also enables us to address transactions, intellectual property, First Amendment, regulatory, management/licensing, publication counseling, and employment issues.

Our national reputation and longstanding track record of successfully defending media in challenging cases often result in cases being abandoned or settled in favor of our clients. For over three decades, we have served as general counsel to the Society of Professional Journalists, the largest and oldest organization of journalists in the nation.

Families that own media businesses also turn to us for strategic counsel on issues of digital publishing and migrating traditional publishing companies to the digital world.

Our Media Mergers and Acquisitions team advises on a full range of transactional issues for a wide variety of companies that are focused on content and distribution, including some of the industry’s most prominent entertainment, news media, sports organizations, and financial sponsors.

Select Experience

  • Represented one of America’s most well-regarded and prominent diversified media companies, The E.W. Scripps Company, for several decades in First Amendment and intellectual property cases, including matters such as
    • Rasmussen v. Collier County Publishing Co., 946 So.2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App, 2006) (early summary judgment granted in matter against Florida newspaper alleging defamatory statements in more than 30 articles and affirmed on appeal).
    • Johnson v. E.W. Scripps Co., 29 Media L. Rep. 2593 (Ky. Cir. Ct. 2001) (directed verdict in jury trial for television station on defamation claim).
    • United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Internet Broadcasting, Ltd. et al., No. 1:00cv03595 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining defendants from cybersquatting and infringing client’s SNOOPY trademark in its domain names and e-mail service with an award of attorneys’ fees and costs as well as assignment of the infringing domain names).
  • Successfully defended The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. in a Second Circuit class action brought by an author alleging breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing of the foreign royalties provision of a publishing agreement.
More »

Professionals

Name Title Office Email
Partner Washington, D.C.
Partner Atlanta
Partner Cleveland
Partner Philadelphia
Partner Atlanta
Partner Costa Mesa
Partner New York
Partner Denver
Partner New York
Partner New York
Counsel Los Angeles
Partner Los Angeles
Partner Washington, D.C.
Of Counsel Washington, D.C.
Partner Washington, D.C.
Partner Washington, D.C.
Associate New York
Partner New York
Partner Chicago

Experience

  • Represented one of America’s most well-regarded and prominent diversified media companies, The E.W. Scripps Company, for several decades in First Amendment and intellectual property cases, including matters such as
    • Rasmussen v. Collier County Publishing Co., 946 So.2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App, 2006) (early summary judgment granted in matter against Florida newspaper alleging defamatory statements in more than 30 articles and affirmed on appeal).
    • Johnson v. E.W. Scripps Co., 29 Media L. Rep. 2593 (Ky. Cir. Ct. 2001) (directed verdict in jury trial for television station on defamation claim).
    • United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Internet Broadcasting, Ltd. et al., No. 1:00cv03595 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining defendants from cybersquatting and infringing client’s SNOOPY trademark in its domain names and e-mail service with an award of attorneys’ fees and costs as well as assignment of the infringing domain names).
  • Successfully defended The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. in a Second Circuit class action brought by an author alleging breach of contract and breach of good faith and fair dealing of the foreign royalties provision of a publishing agreement.
  • Counsel in multiple cases defending bloggers and others in District of Columbia libel actions, including the first case raising the District of Columbia’s anti-SLAPP statute (Strategic Law Against Public Participation), enacted in 2011 to protect libel defendants from the time and expense of defending against meritless claims.
  • Sweeney v. New York Times, USDC, ND OH, Case No. 1:00 CV 2942 (2004) obtained jury verdict in newspaper’s favor in libel action brought by a Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court.
  • Young v. New Haven Advocate, 315 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2002) persuaded the Fourth Circuit to reject personal jurisdiction based solely on access to an Internet website in the first federal appellate court decision to address this critical issue and one that has become a leading authority on the subject.
  • El Dia, Inc. v. Rossello, 165 F.3d 106 (1st Cir. 1999) Represented largest newspaper in Puerto Rico in Section 1983 civil rights action against sitting governor and established key First Circuit precedent that government retaliation against the press’ exercise of First Amendment rights is actionable.
  • Moldea v. New York Times Co., 22 F.3d 310 (D.C. Cir. 1994) persuaded the D.C. Circuit to extend opinion protection to a book review at a time when the Supreme Court’s ruling in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990) had unsettled this area of the law.
  • McFarlane v. Esquire Magazine, 1994 WL 510088 (D.D.C. 1994), aff’d, 74 F.3d 1296 (D.C. Cir. 1996) convinced federal courts in the District of Columbia to take an exacting view of the evidence needed to prove actual malice and to dismiss a case in which the plaintiff, a former senior government official, had failed to meet this heightened standard.
  • National Life Insurance Co. v. Phillips Publishing, Inc., 793 F. Supp. 627 (D. Md. 1992) convinced Maryland federal court to hold that, regardless of whether the challenged statements might be classified as commercial speech, a public-figure plaintiff must demonstrate in a defamation case that the defendant acted with actual malice.

Recognition

  • Chambers USA: Media & Entertainment in the District of Columbia (2016, 2017)
  • BTI Client Service 30: BakerHostetler advanced 19 positions to #9 (2016)
  • U.S. News - Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" (2016)
    • First Amendment Law
      • Metro Atlanta, Tier 2 
      • Metro Washington, D.C., Tier 2
    • Litigation - First Amendment 
      • National Tier 1
      • Metro Cleveland, Tier 1
      • Metro Denver, Tier 2
    • Media Law
      • National Tier 3
      • Metro Washington, D.C., Tier 3
  • The Best Lawyers in America© (2016)
    • 2 lawyers named in Communications Law
    • 3 lawyers named in First Amendment Law
    • 3 lawyers named in Litigation - First Amendment
    • 2 lawyers named in Media Law

News

News

Press Releases

Publications

Alerts

Articles

Key Contacts

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit Splits on Approach to Analyzing Graham Factors
November 6, 2017
In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc.,[1] the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the asserted claims of Merck’s U.S. Patent No. 6,486,150 (the ’150 patent) were obvious despite evidence of commercial success and...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
The Federal Circuit Provides a Tutorial on Patent Venue
By Allen M. Sokal
September 27, 2017
The Federal Circuit in In re Cray, Inc., Appeal No. 2017-129 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2017), has provided extensive guidance to district courts on the meaning of an alleged infringer’s “regular and established place of business” under the...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Intellectual Ventures v. Motorola: Use = Benefit for the Purposes of System Claims Infringement
September 21, 2017
On Sept. 13, 2017, the United States District Court for the Federal Circuit clarified the meaning of the term “use” as it applies to system claims in patent infringement actions. In doing so, the court held that an infringer must benefit...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
A Cautionary Tale: IPR Petition Denied Based on Third-Party Submission
August 30, 2017
In Cultec, Inc. v. StormTech LLC, IPR2017-00777, Paper 7 (Aug. 22, 2017), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) denied an inter partes review because the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were said to have been...
Read More ->
IP Intelligence: Insight on Intellectual Property
Federal Circuit’s Concern Regarding PTAB ‘Panel-Stacking’ – Back To The Future?
August 29, 2017
In Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15923, Circuit Judge Dyk, in a concurring opinion joined by Circuit Judge Wallace, questioned “whether the practice of expanding panels where the PTO is...
Read More ->