Wage and Hour

Overview

"Very client-oriented, and a strong talent in the labor and employment arena."

– Chambers USA 2012

Employment-related class action lawsuits have grown exponentially over the past five years. Virtually all aspects of employee compensation have become the target of collective and individual actions in both state and federal courts and ongoing changes in regulations are making compliance increasingly complicated. How can employers stay on top of these issues?

You need well-informed and well-managed representation to effectively meet what are the otherwise burdensome disruptions in time, budgets and employee relations that can arise from wage and hour litigation and compliance challenges. With potentials for large recoveries, adverse publicity and expensive litigation that can threaten your company's bottom line and reputation, you need a full service firm that can help you mitigate risks and stay on top of the ever-changing rules and regulations.

At BakerHostetler, we provide sophisticated, nuanced and creative case management at the outset and at every stage, from preventative advice and counsel and audits to individual, class and collective litigation.

More »
How do our clients benefit?

Our extensive experience in the wage-and-hour area coupled with our proven track record of successfully defending class, collective and representative actions make us uniquely qualified to effectively handle complex wage claims on behalf of our clients.

Our attorneys develop successful defenses for clients facing unusual and large-scale cases, ranging from employee misclassification, unpaid overtime, off-the-clock work and missed meal and rest period issues, to tip pooling and improper deductions from paychecks, among others.

We resolve many class and collective action cases before any full-scale attempt at notice/certification, denying plaintiff’s counsel an opportunity to seek or recover significant fees. When settlement is not an option or otherwise is not in a client’s best interest, we focus on forestalling notice and/or defeating certification.

We are known for our ability to end class actions before they begin.

We help clients fully comply with federal and state wage and hour laws.

We also understand that dealing with wage and hour issues, if they arise, is only half of the battle. Our attorneys offer thoughtful guidance for our clients in the interest of avoiding litigation. We conduct comprehensive wage and hour audits, review and where necessary revamp policies and advise clients on the proper classification of employees and independent contractors.

We also help our clients structure sound policies for off-the-clock work, pay and payroll practices, recording hours worked, vacation and paid-time off practices, commission and bonus plans, tip credits, overtime, meal and rest breaks, and wage deduction issues, among others.

With wage and hour claims, there are always nuances and new trends. Whether the issues are related to unpaid interns, tax implications that result from misclassifying employees as exempt, or telecommunicating and how best to keep track of compensable time—our attorneys spot the trends and prepare our clients.

From a geographical perspective, wage and hour settlements are on the rise in California. Our team in Los Angeles, and nationally, is well versed with California’s rules and regulations for today’s workforces.

Select Experience

  • Defeated certification of a class of over 4,500 employees of a video-rental chain who alleged that they were required to perform compensable tasks after clocking out. A federal judge in Illinois ruled that our attorneys had successfully demonstrated that the plaintiffs’ claims were inconsistent and varied by store and by supervisor.
  • Won decertification of a class of over 600 IT employees claiming unpaid overtime in a case involving the complex issue of whether they exercised sufficient discretion in their duties and responsibilities to meet the administrative exemption under California wage and hour law. On remand, a federal judge found this question would yield individualized answers based on which tasks employees were assigned and how their time was apportioned among tasks.
  • Won summary judgment and denial of a class certification motion brought on behalf of thousands of putative class members throughout the state of California, alleging that the value of meals provided by employers should have been counted as part of employees' wages, thereby increasing the employees' overtime pay. The court found that the employer could lawfully exclude the value of the meals from employees' regular rate of pay and overtime because the employer established that it makes meals available to employees for its own benefit and convenience.
More »

Professionals

Name Title Office Email
Partner Orlando
Partner Atlanta
Associate Chicago
Staff Attorney Cincinnati
Partner Washington, D.C.
Partner Washington, D.C.
Partner Chicago
Counsel Orlando
Partner Cleveland
Associate Los Angeles
Associate Orlando
Associate Chicago
Partner Cincinnati
Partner Cleveland
Partner Orlando
Associate Los Angeles
Partner Los Angeles
Associate Orlando
Partner Los Angeles
Associate New York
Partner New York
Partner Cleveland
Counsel Philadelphia
Partner Cleveland

Experience

  • Defeated certification of a class of over 4,500 employees of a video-rental chain who alleged that they were required to perform compensable tasks after clocking out. A federal judge in Illinois ruled that our attorneys had successfully demonstrated that the plaintiffs’ claims were inconsistent and varied by store and by supervisor.
  • Won decertification of a class of over 600 IT employees claiming unpaid overtime in a case involving the complex issue of whether they exercised sufficient discretion in their duties and responsibilities to meet the administrative exemption under California wage and hour law. On remand, a federal judge found this question would yield individualized answers based on which tasks employees were assigned and how their time was apportioned among tasks.
  • Won summary judgment and denial of a class certification motion brought on behalf of thousands of putative class members throughout the state of California, alleging that the value of meals provided by employers should have been counted as part of employees' wages, thereby increasing the employees' overtime pay. The court found that the employer could lawfully exclude the value of the meals from employees' regular rate of pay and overtime because the employer established that it makes meals available to employees for its own benefit and convenience.

Recognition

  • Chambers USA: Labor & Employment
    • Florida (2007 to 2017)
    • Ohio: Band 1 (2007 to 2017)
    • Texas (2014 to 2017)
    • Recognized Practitioner in California (2017)
    • Recognized Practitioner in the District of Columbia (2017)
  • Recognized as one of the top law firms for client service, we were named to the 2018 BTI Client Service 30 for the fourth consecutive year.
  • “Best Law Firms” 2014: National Tier 1 Ranking in the area of Employment Law - Management from U.S. News – Best Lawyers®.
  • The Best Lawyers in America© 2014: Twenty-two partners were selected by their peers for inclusion in various employment-related fields.
  • Corporate Counsel® and The American Lawyer magazines "Go-to Law Firm” for Labor & Employment by general counsel (2013)
  • Workforce Management Magazine: Top Employment Law Firms
  • The Lawdragon/Human Resource Executive list of the Nation's Top Employment Attorneys includes three members of the team in their Top 100 list, with one additional attorney named among the nation's top 20 labor lawyers.
  • Florida Trend “Legal Elite"
  • Numerous partners have been certified as employment law specialists by their respective state bar associations.

Key Contacts

Blog

In The Blogs

Previous Next
Employment Class Action Blog
Supreme Court Overrules Sixth Circuit (Again) In Class Action Dispute Over Retiree Medical Benefits
February 21, 2018
Is Yard-Man really dead this time? This issue should never have arisen, the Supreme Court should not have had to address it in 2015, and it shouldn’t have required Supreme Court attention a second time just three years later. But it did.  ...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Courts Deny Certification for Adequacy of Representation in Second Class Action
February 16, 2018
One of the tactics in the current plaintiffs’ wage and hour playbook is to bring a second claim after settlement of an initial class or collective action lawsuit. In these cases, the second set of claims is purportedly brought on behalf of...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Faulty Statistics Lead to Decertification of California Wage and Hour Case
February 9, 2018
Nearly four years ago, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Duran v. U.S. Bank National Ass’n, 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014), in which it virtually catalogued the many problems inherent in the plaintiffs’ statistical case...
Read More ->
Employment Class Action Blog
Minnesota Court Cuts Proposed Attorney Fee Award From $3.2 Million to $600,000 in Off-the-Clock Case
February 7, 2018
In 2014, five law firms brought a claim for alleged off-the-clock work. As discovery revealed, the claims all arose out of conduct involving a single shift supervisor at a single restaurant, and the conduct was disputed at that. Although...
Read More ->
Employment Law Spotlight
Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Will Be in Effect Before You Know It
January 8, 2018
As you may know, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed the Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act in July, expanding state protections for pregnant women and new mothers, and setting new rules for employers with six or more...
Read More ->