Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Ohio Clock

Hallway with a grandfather clock displayed

Congress Faces Pre-election Budget Vote to Avoid Government Shutdown

Senate Passes Kids Online Safety Measure But House Passage Unclear

Current State of U.S. Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine – August 29, 2024

Current State of U.S. Export Controls in Response to the Russian Federation’s Invasion of Ukraine – August 29, 2024

On July 31, 2023, the California Privacy Protection Agency’s (“CPPA” or the “Agency”) Enforcement Division announced a review into the data privacy practices of connected vehicle (“CV”) manufacturers and related CV technologies.<a href="#_ftn1" id="_ftnref1">[1]</a> This marks the CPPA's inaugural public announcement regarding its enforcement priorities. To date, the agency has focused its efforts on rulemaking with the final regulations for the California Consumer Privacy Act as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) (hereinafter referred to as the “CCPA”) being adopted in March 2023. The CPPA is the first state data protection authority in the United States, and its enforcement authority began on July 1, 2023.

core/paragraph

The focus on connected vehicles marks a departure from the California Attorney General’s (“CA DOJ”) approach to investigations and inquiries, which so far have focused on the retail, advertising platforms, online platforms, and hospitality sectors.<a href="#_ftn2" id="_ftnref2">[2]</a>

Ashkan Soltani, Executive Director of CPPA, remarked in a press release that modern vehicles are “effectively connected computers on wheels,” noting that they collect a wealth of information through built-in apps, sensors, and cameras, which can “monitor people both inside and near the vehicle.”<a href="#_ftn3" id="_ftnref3">[3]</a> CVs also are capable of bidirectional communication with external systems beyond the user’s vehicle, and can commonly share location data, or information related to web-based entertainment features, smartphone integrations, or inward- or external-facing cameras. In their press release, the CPPA stated that data privacy considerations are “critical” because CVs “often automatically gather consumers’ locations, personal preferences, and details about their daily lives.”<a href="#_ftn4" id="_ftnref4">[4]</a> Thus, the CCPA Enforcement Division is making inquiries into the connected vehicle space to “understand how these companies are complying with California law when they collect and use consumers’ data.”<a href="#_ftn5" id="_ftnref5">[5]</a>

The current 12-month delay on enforcement of the Agency’s privacy regulations does not impact the Agency’s enforcement authority regarding the rights that went into effect on January 1, 2020 and were enforceable on July 1, 2020. Additionally, the Agency and the California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a petition with California’s Third District Court of Appeal to overturn a recent trial court decision that imposed a 12-month delay on enforcement of the Agency’s privacy regulations.<a href="#_ftn6" id="_ftnref6">[6]</a>

Areas for Enforcement Focus

This announcement of the enforcement focus on CV companies comes on the heels of the CPPA’s July 14th Board meeting where Michael Macko, Deputy Director of Enforcement, said that the Agency will vigorously enforce the new statutory changes to the CCPA, which came into effect on January 1, 2023. In particular, Macko signaled that the CPPA will prioritize privacy notices and policies, businesses’ compliance with the right to delete, and the implementation of consumer requests, such as opt-out requests. See the Baker team’s previous coverage of the July 14th Board meeting <a href="https://www.bakerdatacounsel.com/blogs/top-5-takeaways-from-cppa-meeting-on-july-14-2023/">here</a>. As stated in the press release, CPPA’s first round of enforcement actions will track those three areas and focus on: (1) the right to know the personal information collected about them by businesses, (2) the right to delete that information, and (3) the right to stop its sale or sharing.<a href="#_ftn7" id="_ftnref7">[7]</a>

We share below some practical tips for CV companies based on our experience responding to California regulators’ inquiries and enforcement actions under the CCPA in other industries, as well as our experience with advising CV companies.

Notice and Right to Know. The CPPA will likely ask CV manufacturers and CV technology companies how and when consumer data is collected. This may include a request for a description of the companies’ privacy policies and practices, including practices relating to how and when a notice at collection, as required by the CCPA, would be delivered. In the past, regulators have asked for copies of privacy notices or links to the notices.

core/list

core/list-item

Right to Delete. The right to delete was one of the rights that the CA DOJ focused on in previous enforcement actions. This right provides consumers the right to request that businesses delete personal information they collected, and this request should also flow down to tell service providers. The right is subject to certain exceptions including if a business is “required to complete the transaction for which the personal information was collected, fulfill the terms of a written warranty or product recall conducted in accordance with federal laws, provide a good or service requested by the consumer, or reasonably anticipated by the consumer within the context of a business’s ongoing business relationship with the consumer, or otherwise perform a contract between the business and the user, to ensure security and integrity, or to comply with a legal obligation.”<a href="#_ftn8" id="_ftnref8">[8]</a>

Right to Opt-out of Sale or Sharing. The right to opt-out and how companies respond to opt-out requests have been and continue to be areas of focus for CCPA enforcement. Regulator expectations related to opt-out rights and the business’ use of adtech were published as part of the first enforcement action announced by CA DOJ on August 24, 2022. The press release can be found <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-announces-settlement-sephora-part-ongoing-enforcement">here</a>. The settlement of that action, which provides a new definition of what it means for businesses to engage in “sale using online tracking technologies” can be found <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Filed%20Judgment.pdf.pdf">here</a>.

Employee Privacy. <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-announces-settlement-sephora-part-ongoing-enforcement"></a><a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/Filed%20Judgment.pdf.pdf"></a>On July 14, the CA DOJ announced an investigative sweep, through inquiry letters sent to large California employers requesting information on the companies’ compliance with the CCPA with respect to the personal information of employees and job applicants. Although the enforcement focus of the two agencies may be different, the CPPA could likewise inquire into how the data collected from CV manufacturers and related technologies can be used by employers. For example, the CPPA appears to be interested in the use of automated decision-making technology (“ADMT”) to monitor employees and contracts. See below for further discussion on this.

The Road Ahead with CPPA Rulemaking

While the CPPA is starting to flex its enforcement muscles, rulemaking continues and we heard glimpses during the July 14th Board meeting what we can expect to see in the draft regulations for cybersecurity audits, privacy risk assessment and ADMT. Specifically, with ADMT, the CPPA is considering regulations governing consumer access and opt-out rights when a business uses ADMT, which they defined as any system, software, or process—including one derived from machine-learning, statistics, or other data processing or artificial intelligence techniques—that processes personal information and uses computation as whole or part of a system to make or execute a decision or facilitate human decision-making. The CPPA is interested in exploring the use of ADMT in at least the following three areas:

Using ADMT in furtherance of a decision that results in the provision or denial of financial or lending services, housing, insurance, education enrollment or opportunity, criminal justice, employment or contracting opportunities, or compensation, healthcare services, or access to essential goods, services, or opportunities.

Using ADMT to monitor or surveil employees, independent contractors, job applicants, or students.

Using ADMT to track the behavior, location, movements, or actions of consumers in publicly accessible places.

Thus, CV companies who also employ automated vehicle technologies or other artificial intelligence and machine learning—whether on vehicle or for backend business purposes — (or who share data for such uses) will want to be aware of the increased scrutiny of privacy regulators on ADMT. We expect that CPPA inquiries into CV technologies will likely expand to include ADMT inquiries.

Implications for the Connected Vehicle Industry

Although the CCPA is more technical and expansive than previous privacy regimes, the broad themes highlighted in the privacy concerns above will be familiar with many connected car companies. The industry has kept privacy concerns front of mind, recognizing the vast amounts of data necessarily collected and processed by connected vehicles and the important roles that data plays both in ensuring consumer safety and in improving user experience.

Federal actors, agencies, and industry groups alike have held consumer privacy as a key goal in the increasingly connected and automated automotive industry. For example, in July 2015, Senators Edward Markey (D-MA.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT.) proposed the Security and Privacy in Your Car Act (“SPY Car Act”), which would have required the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) to establish certain consumer privacy and data security rules. Shortly thereafter, Representatives Joe Wilson (R-SC 2nd District) and Ted Lieu (D-CA 36th District) suggested a scaled down SPY Car Study Act, likewise focused on privacy policies and practices. While those bills were not enacted, federal regulators continued to speak to privacy concerns. For example, the first U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Automated Vehicles Policy, published September 2016 (“AV 1.0”) highlighted privacy as a key area of federal concern; in 2017, the FTC and NHTSA held a joint workshop to examine the consumer privacy and security issues posed by automated and connected vehicles; and in July 2017, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) published a Vehicle Data Privacy report based on its review of the privacy practices of 13 connected vehicle manufacturers. In 2018-2020, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (“NIST”) held privacy roundtables then published its first Privacy Framework, building off its Cybersecurity Framework.

The CPPA’s scrutiny comes at a time when the promise of connectivity to revolutionize the automotive industry is closer to fruition than ever before. Industry actors and federal and state agencies have long supported adoption of vehicle-to-vehicle (“V2V”), vehicle-to-infrastructure (“V2I”), and vehicle-to-everything (“V2X”) communications to reduce crashes, decrease traffic congestion, and enable increased vehicle automation. In April 2023, three Federal Communications Commission bureaus granted a joint request by certain vehicle manufacturers, equipment manufacturers, and state departments of transportation for a waiver of several FCC rules to allow for deployment of cellular-vehicle-to-everything (“C-V2X”) technology in the upper 30 MHz of spectrum in the 5.895-5.925 GHz band while the agency continues to work on C-V2X rules. The FCC has engaged in decades of study to develop a comprehensive national framework for intelligent transportation systems (“ITS”) while balancing this need against finite spectrum resources, and the waivers were granted based on input from industry leaders such as the Intelligent Transportation Society of America.

At the same time, connected vehicle makers are becoming increased targets for regulatory scrutiny. In addition to the CPPA’s recent announcement, earlier this year, in response to the investigation of one of the leading electric vehicle manufacturers by the Dutch Regulatory Authority, that car manufacturer updated the in the cars in the European Union so that its built-in, external security cameras no longer continuously film around a vehicle but are disabled by default until a user turns on recording. The last 10 minutes of recorded footage will be saved under the new settings, instead of the hour of footage that was previously stored. And just as the CPPA has increased its interest in ADMT, regulators in the US and abroad have been active in proposing laws and regulations related to AI that are expected to impact CV companies more broadly.

The volume and complexity of the data processed by CVs, together with the quickly evolving automotive technologies present challenges for both connected vehicle companies and regulators to get this right as the industry keeps up with the fast-paced privacy legal developments. Companies will want to seek counsel well-versed in both California privacy laws and in the connected vehicle industry to ensure that their policies and practices are ready for near-term CPPA review and expected increased regulatory scrutiny.

core/separator

<a href="#_ftnref1" id="_ftn1">[1]</a> CPPA to Review Privacy Practices of Connected Vehicles and Related Technologies, <a href="https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230731.html">https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230731.html</a> (last visited August 8, 2023).

<a href="#_ftnref2" id="_ftn2">[2]</a> See CCPA Enforcement Case Examples, <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa/enforcement">https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa/enforcement</a> (last visited August 8, 2023).

<a href="#_ftnref3" id="_ftn3">[3]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref4" id="_ftn4">[4]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref5" id="_ftn5">[5]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref6" id="_ftn6">[6]</a> CPPA Seeks to Overturn Superior Court Decision Delaying Enforcement of Consumer Privacy Regulations, <a href="https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230804.html">https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230804.html</a> (last visited August 8, 2023).

<a href="#_ftnref7" id="_ftn7">[7]</a> See generally CPPA to Review Privacy Practices of Connected Vehicles and Related Technologies, <a href="https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230731.html">https://cppa.ca.gov/announcements/2023/20230731.html</a> (last visited August 8, 2023).

<a href="#_ftnref8" id="_ftn8">[8]</a> Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.105(d).

<a href="#_ftnref9" id="_ftn9">[9]</a> See Frequently Asked Questions about Global Privacy Control available at <a href="https://globalprivacycontrol.org/#faq">https://globalprivacycontrol.org/#faq</a> (last visited August 8, 2023).

California Privacy Protection Agency Turns its Attention to Connected Vehicles

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights