Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Jeff Paravano, Michelle Hervey, Nick Mowbray Speak to Tax Club of Cleveland

Antitrust Advocate

Courts Split on FTC’s Authority to Issue Noncompete Rule

Employment Law Spotlight

Sunshine State Update: New Florida Law Forbids Local Employment Regulation in Three Areas

Daniel Kaufman Comments on FTC Monitoring of Consumers’ “Right to Repair”

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved in a 3-1 vote the long-debated proxy advisory firm reforms proposed on <a href="https://www.bakerlaw.com/alerts/sec-proposes-amendments-to-proxy-rules-related-to-the-regulation-of-proxy-advisers-and-shareholder-proposals">Nov. 5, 2019</a>. The final rule amendments adopted were modified from the original proposal in response to commentary. Most notably, the final rules do not require proxy advisory firms to provide companies an opportunity to preview and provide feedback on a proxy advisor’s voting recommendations prior to issuance to the advisor’s clients as initially proposed.  The reforms include:  <ul> 	<li>Modifying the exemptions to the proxy solicitation rules relied on by proxy advisors.</li> 	<li>Supplemental guidance regarding investment advisers’ use and reliance on proxy advisors relative to their proxy voting responsibilities.</li> </ul>  In its initial release, the SEC stated that the proposed rule amendments are “to help ensure that investors who use proxy voting advice receive more accurate, transparent and complete information on which to make voting decisions.”  Among other things, the rulemaking:  <ul> 	<li>Codifies that proxy voting advice constitutes a solicitation.</li> 	<li>Requires a substantive conflict of interest disclosure.</li> 	<li>Provides for prior or concurrent disclosure of voting advice to companies and proxy advisor clients and a means for clients to access the company’s response to such advice before they vote.</li> 	<li>Illustrates by example circumstances under which proxy voting advice may be misleading under Rule 14a-9.</li> </ul>  In conjunction with the rule amendments, the commission also issued supplemental guidance to investment advisers on proxy voting responsibilities.  This long-awaited action by the SEC concludes more than a decade of discussion on a highly controversial topic that ultimately changes the nature of public shareholder communications. The SEC believes that the proposed changes will encourage constructive engagement between long-term shareholders and issuers and help prevent misuse of the shareholder proposal process.  The amendments will be effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, but compliance by covered proxy advisors under new Rule 14a-2(b)(9) amendments is not required until Dec. 1, 2021. The supplemental guidance is effective upon its publication in the Federal Register.  If you are interested in learning more about these amendments, please contact Suzanne K. Hanselman at <a href="mailto:shanselman@bakerlaw.com">shanselman@bakerlaw.com</a> or your regular BakerHostetler representative.  Authorship Credit: Suzanne K. Hanselman and Anthony S. Calanni

SEC Approves Proposed Amendments Related to the Regulation of Proxy Advisors

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights