Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

An Introduction to Name, Image and Likeness (NIL)

Data Counsel

Welcome to the 10th edition of our annual Data Security Incident Response Report!

AD Nauseam

AD Nauseam: A Different Type of Imposter Syndrome

BakerHostetler launches 2024 Data Security Incident Response Report, ‘Persistent Threats, New Challenges’

Partner Andrew Grossman is quoted in an article published on July 22, 2021, in Law360 Tax Authority. The article, “Repatriation Tax is Constitutional, US Gov’t Tells 9th Circ.,” discusses the U.S. government’s recent argument urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to uphold a Washington federal judge’s order that <a href="http://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/1330722/repatriation-tax-constitutional-court-says-in-tossing-suit">dismissed a tax refund suit</a> brought by Charles and Kathleen Moore, who had contended that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s repatriation provision violated the U.S. Constitution. The article noted that the Moores are represented by Partners Andrew Grossman, David Rivkin Jr. and Jeffrey Paravano, and Associate Sean Sandoloski, as well as by the Competitive Enterprise Institute.  The Moores had argued that the measure was a direct tax on personal property — specifically, their shares in a foreign corporation — that violated the U.S. Constitution’s Sixteenth Amendment, which requires direct taxes to be apportioned based on state population. Grossman said that, “[I]n the government&#39;s view, taxable ‘income’ under the Constitution is anything that the government chooses to tax, including private property.”  <a href="https://www.law360.com/tax-authority/articles/1405830">Read more.</a>

core/freeform

Washington, D.C.

Partner

Andrew M. Grossman

Andrew Grossman Comments in Law360 on Government’s Argument in Repatriation Tax Appellate Case

Related Services

Featured Insights