Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

The New Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Enforcement Agenda (Employee Benefit Plan Review)

Timothy Longman Serves as Panel Member for ABA Evidence and Exemptions Speaking Event

Justin Yedor Comments on Recent CPPA Delete Act Enforcement in Lexology

Out-of-the-Box: The Rise of Custom Configuration in the Age of Generative AI (AALL Spectrum)

core/heading

The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) recently announced a new policy to “stop participating in regulation by prosecution” in the digital asset industry. Instead, it will focus on prosecuting bad actors in the space and otherwise support the “vibrant and inclusive digital economy.”<a id="_ftnref1" href="#_ftn1">[1]</a>

core/list-item

The new policy heeds the Trump Administration’s Executive Order 14178 directing the DOJ to protect and promote “the ability of individual citizens and private-sector entities alike to access and use for lawful purposes open public blockchain networks without persecution.”<a id="_ftnref2" href="#_ftn2">[2]</a>

To that end and in light of the existing regulatory uncertainty, the policy directs prosecutors, as a matter of discretion, not to charge regulatory violations in cases involving digital assets unless there is evidence of willful violations of licensing or registration requirements. 

The DOJ will also pursue illicit financing of those bad actors, including when it involves digital assets, but will not pursue actions against the platforms that the bad actors utilize to conduct their illegal activities.

The DOJ will also fully participate in the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, which aims to provide regulatory clarity for the crypto industry.

core/list

On April 7, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced in a memorandum to all DOJ employees (the “Blanche Memorandum”) that the DOJ “will stop participating in regulation by prosecution” and “no longer pursue litigation or enforcement actions that have the effect of superimposing regulatory frameworks on digital assets.”<a href="#_ftn3" id="_ftnref3">[3]</a> Instead, the DOJ made clear that it will refocus its resources on clear criminal activity rather than situations where Congress has not yet clearly defined unlawful conduct with respect to digital assets.

core/paragraph

The Blanche Memorandum marks a complete pivot from the prior administration and states the DOJ will refrain from “target[ing] virtual currency exchanges, mixing and tumbling services, and offline wallets for the acts of their end users or unwitting violations of regulations.”<a href="#_ftn4" id="_ftnref4">[4]</a> Instead, the DOJ will concentrate on “conduct victimizing investors,” including “embezzlement and misappropriation of customers’ funds on exchanges, digital asset investment scams, fake digital asset development projects such as rug pulls, hacking of exchanges and decentralized autonomous organizations resulting in theft of funds, and exploiting vulnerabilities in smart contracts.”<a href="#_ftn5" id="_ftnref5">[5]</a> The DOJ “will also prioritize cases involving the use of digital assets in furtherance of unlawful conduct by cartels, Transnational Criminal Organizations, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and Specially Designated Global Terrorists.”<a href="#_ftn6" id="_ftnref6">[6]</a>

The Blanche Memorandum lists specific regulatory violations the DOJ should refrain from prosecuting, provided there is no evidence an individual knew of and willfully violated the applicable regulation.<a href="#_ftn7" id="_ftnref7">[7]</a> This list includes unlicensed money transmitting under 18 U.S.C. § 1960(b)(1)(A) and (B), Bank Secrecy Act violations, unregistered securities offerings violations, unregistered broker-dealer violations, and other similar violations under the Commodity Exchange Act.<a href="#_ftn8" id="_ftnref8">[8]</a> The DOJ will also no longer be charging violations of the Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act of 1934, and Commodity Exchange Act, or the regulations promulgated thereunder, if doing so would require it to litigate the issue of whether a digital asset is a “security” or a “commodity” and there is an adequate alternative criminal charge available (e.g., mail or wire fraud).<a href="#_ftn9" id="_ftnref9">[9]</a>

The Blanche Memorandum rescinds all prior policies and directives that are inconsistent with these new policies, instructs federal prosecutors to close any ongoing investigations or actions that are similarly inconsistent, and disbands the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.<a href="#_ftn10" id="_ftnref10">[10]</a>

Other Regulators Appear to Follow DOJ’s New Policy

One day after the Blanche Memorandum was published, the Acting Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) issued a statement directing CFTC staff and the Director of Enforcement to “adhere to the [DOJ]’s policy on digital assets enforcement priorities and digital assets charging considerations” set forth in the Blanche Memorandum and not to charge regulatory violations in cases involving digital assets unless the individual knew of and willfully violated the regulation at issue.<a href="#_ftn11" id="_ftnref11">[11]</a>

As of the date of this Client Alert, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has not issued a statement commenting on the Blanche Memorandum. Yet, its recent dismissals of enforcement actions against several exchanges and other digital asset actors indicate that the SEC’s enforcement efforts will follow the spirit of this new DOJ policy.

The DOJ’s new digital asset policy of targeting bad actors in the crypto industry rather than the crypto platforms and exchanges themselves marks another demonstrable step toward fulfilling the Administration’s campaign promise to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world.” However, the policy does not grant the crypto industry carte blanche to disregard U.S. law. Federal prosecutors and regulators seem ready to continue investigating and charging individuals or entities that know they are subject to certain regulations but nevertheless willfully disregard them. Thus, it remains important that digital asset participants understand whether and to what extent they are subject to U.S. law, craft regulatory programs to ensure they are in compliance as necessary, and – where it remains unclear – engage with the Administration and regulators to help them achieve the market structure appropriate for the crypto industry.

The regulatory landscape for the U.S. digital assets market continues to rapidly evolve in 2025. BakerHostetler is here to help market actors navigate this ever-changing environment and seize opportunities through our interdisciplinary attorneys on our Web3 and Digital Assets team, Digital and Innovative Markets team, Federal Policy team, Corporate and Securities team, Financial Services team, and White Collar, Investigations, and Securities Enforcement and Litigation team. Please feel free to contact any of our experienced professionals if you have questions about this alert.

core/separator

<a href="#_ftnref1" id="_ftn1">[1]</a> Mem. from Todd Blanche, Deputy Att’y Gen., Dep’t of Justice, to all DOJ Employees (Apr. 7, 2025), available at <a href="https://www.justice.gov/dag/media/1395781/dl?inline">https://www.justice.gov/dag/media/1395781/dl?inline</a>.

<a href="#_ftnref2" id="_ftn2">[2]</a> Executive Order 14178, §&nbsp;1 (Jan. 23, 2025).

<a href="#_ftnref3" id="_ftn3">[3]</a> Blanche Mem. at 1.

<a href="#_ftnref4" id="_ftn4">[4]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref5" id="_ftn5">[5]</a> Id. at 2.

<a href="#_ftnref6" id="_ftn6">[6]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref7" id="_ftn7">[7]</a> Id.

<a href="#_ftnref8" id="_ftn8">[8]</a> Id. at 2–3.

<a href="#_ftnref9" id="_ftn9">[9]</a> Id. at 3. The Blanche Memorandum provides two permissible positions under this policy: (1) Bitcoin or Ether is a “commodity” under the CEA; and (2) filing securities fraud charges where the “security” at issue is a digital asset company’s stock. Id.

<a href="#_ftnref10" id="_ftn10">[10]</a> Id. at 2, 4.

<a href="#_ftnref11" id="_ftn11">[11]</a> Release No. 9063-25, Acting Chairman Pham Lauds DOJ Policy Ending Regulation by Prosecution of Digital Assets Industry and Directs CFTC Staff to Comply with Executive Orders, Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n (Apr. 8, 2025), <a href="https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9063-25">https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9063-25</a>.

DOJ’s New Policy on Prosecutions to Focus on Bad Actors, Not Digital Asset Industry

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights