Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Practices & Industries

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

SEC Chief Enforcement Accountant Confirms SEC to Staff New Enforcement Group Targeting Auditors and SOX Compliance

ADventures in Law

FTC Signals Importance of Early Economic Engagement in Consumer Protection Investigations

Nichole Sterling Discusses AI at American Institute of Architects Committee Meeting

BakerHostetler’s DADM Group 2026 DSIR Report Makes Headlines with Major Media Coverage

In an April 8 <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2026/04/how-best-engage-bcp-be-economic-analysis-bcp-investigations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FTC Business Blog post</a>, Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) Director Christopher Mufarrige underscored the importance of proactive and rigorous economic analysis in consumer protection investigations where the FTC is seeking monetary relief. Businesses responding to a Civil Investigative Demand should be prepared to substantively engage with both BCP and the FTC’s Bureau of Economics (BE), consistent with BE’s recently expanded <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/bureaus-offices/bureau-economics/best-practices" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Economics Best Practices guidance</a>.

core/paragraph

core/heading

Director Mufarrige emphasized that BCP works closely with BE and continues to prioritize economic analysis to evaluate consumer harm. While acknowledging that it is often not possible for BCP to estimate the economic harm at the outset of an investigation, Director Mufarrige stated that BCP will endeavor to provide general information about its theories of economic harm and BE’s empirical analysis when it sends businesses draft complaints and orders seeking monetary relief.

Businesses under investigation should be prepared to promptly engage with and respond to this economic analysis. The FTC’s guidance outlines clear expectations for businesses under investigation:

Assumption of BE Involvement: In matters seeking monetary relief, businesses should plan for active BE participation.

core/list-item

Early, Substantive Engagement: Businesses should be prepared to address economic issues as soon as they receive a draft complaint and order, or potentially even earlier.

Data That Enables Analysis: Companies should provide rigorous economic analysis and be prepared to explain their methodology instead of relying on summary conclusions, because BE is less likely to engage with summaries.

core/list

Combined with the expanded application of BE’s Economics Best Practices guidance (typically more associated with antitrust analysis) to BCP investigations, this post reinforces the importance of early substantive engagement with BCP and BE on economic issues.

Related Services

Featured Insights