Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Practices & Industries

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Alexander Reid Moderates Panel at Tax Issues for Health Care Organizations

ADventures in Law

NAD on How To Support Your ‘World’s Best’ Claims

Artie McConnell Comments on Mangione State, Federal Cases in <em>Bloomberg Law</em>

IP Intelligence Report

Ninth Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Trademark Tarnishment in the Long-Running <em>Bad Spaniels</em> Dispute

Yes, we know that finding the line between claims and puffery can sometimes be fun and sometimes be painful. In our <a href="https://www.adventures-in-law.com/blogs/puff-or-claim-nad-shines-light-on-where-to-draw-that-line/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">first puffery blog post</a> last week, we focused on “best smelling” claims for sunscreen. Now we turn to the sticky subject of athletic tape. 

core/paragraph

Mueller Sports Medicine challenged certain claims made by Howies Hockey that its Athletic Tape and Hockey Tape were the “World’s Highest Quality.” Mueller argued that the relative quality of athletic tapes is something one can measure and test and because of this, Howies’ claim had to be supported. <a href="https://bbbprograms.org/media/newsroom/decisions/howies-hockey" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NAD instead found</a> that when used by itself, such a claim would be understood as a statement of corporate pride or bravado that does not require support.

In some contexts, Howies used the tagline with or near descriptions of product attributes, things like performance, durability and adhesion.

In that case, NAD recommended discontinuing or modifying the claim to avoid conveying product superiority. It is not clear from the decision exactly how to do that, but presumably some clear separation between the tagline and any performance discussion would suffice.

An interesting addition to the decision was a specific recommendation that Howies make “bona fide, good faith efforts” to instruct third-party resale sites to discontinue or modify the claim as outlined in the decision. Often whether an advertiser has control over third parties or what their obligations are regarding third parties comes up in the context of a compliance challenge. Here, NAD has addressed the issue up front. We will keep watching to see if this is an outlier or a new trend and whether NAD gives any guidance as to what qualifies as bona fide, good faith efforts. 

Related Services

Featured Insights