Careers

Diversity

With 17 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Services

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

IP Intelligence Report

Federal Circuit Addresses Personal Jurisdiction and Amazon’s Patent Dispute Procedure: What to Know Going Forward

How FTC History Did Not Affect the FTC’s Approach to Non-Competes (but Should Have?): From the Nader Report to the Present

Morgan Holtman Presents at Tax Planning Conference

Energy and Utility Insights

core/embed

Various products are subject to systems (e.g., purchase agreements) under which product purchasers and third parties are prevented from repairing the products and the only way to repair the product is to proceed through an authorized vendor or the original manufacturer. Manufacturers often favor such systems, as the systems (1) allow the manufacturers to obtain additional revenue through their own repair services, (2) prevent consumers and third-parties from accessing trade secrets that are contained within the products; and (3) prevent consumers from injuring themselves during repairs of complex products. Consumers are sometimes concerned with such systems, as the systems can limit consumer options to repair the devices and could lead to increased waste, as consumers may elect to purchase new products instead of committing to a lengthy and expensive repair process to fix an existing product. This issue has been getting some traction around the country, as several states have passed (or are reviewing) legislation related to providing purchasers with a “right to repair” products that they may purchase. In addition to its coverage in the legal news, “right to repair” was recently mentioned on CBS News.

core/paragraph

Questions and Comments: <a href="mailto:arabinowitz@bakerlaw.com">arabinowitz@bakerlaw.com</a>

core/button

core/buttons

<strong>Subscribe to BakerHosts®</strong>

<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bakerhosts/id1525414457">Apple Podcast</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5jYXB0aXZhdGUuZm0vYmFrZXJob3N0cy8">Google Podcast</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-bakerhosts-69294646/">iHeartRadio</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/5JYSj8yj8ngcuvEytrhGZa">Spotify</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-state-tax-show/bakerhosts">Stitcher</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://tunein.com/podcasts/Business--Economics-Podcasts/BakerHosts-p1352114/">TuneIn</a>

When Fixing One Problem Creates Another: How Patent Infringement Arises Out of Product Repairs

Featured Insights

Related Services

Featured Insights