Careers

Diversity

With 18 offices, from New York to Los Angeles and Seattle to Orlando, we live and work in communities all over the U.S., collaborating across locations, disciplines and even borders. Our experienced, highly ranked lawyers serve businesses wherever they are and wherever they want to go.

Offices

About Us

Pages

Professionals

Thought leadership: blogs, podcasts, videos, publications, events and news

Insights

Practices & Industries

Pro Bono

Am Law 100 firm with practices in Business, Digital Assets and Data Management, Intellectual Property, Labor & Employment, Litigation and Tax.

Home | BakerHostetler

Current State of US Export Controls in Response to the Russian Federation’s Invasion of Ukraine – As of December 5, 2025

Oren Warshavsky, Melissa Mannino, Lana Muranovic Recognized by Lexology Index Client Choice

Chad Rutkowski Moderates Panel at PLI’s Artificial Intelligence Law 2026

The False Claims Act Reloaded: A Powerful Tool for Tariff Evasion Cases (<em>For the Defense</em>)

Kristina understands the significance of focusing on details in evaluating clients' environmental needs. She makes it a point to learn the intricacies of the often-complex industrial processes, operations and development objectives of each client, which allows for a thorough evaluation of environmental matters and ensures productive and meaningful interaction with clients' technical consultants.

core/freeform

J.D., University of Florida Levin College of Law, 2002, 

B.A., University of Florida, 1999, 

<ul>
<li>Chambers USA: Litigation: Environment in Florida (2015, 2025)</li>
</ul>


Orlando

Chambers USA Guide 2025 Recognizes 171 BakerHostetler Attorneys and 73 Practice Areas

BakerHostetler advised target company in successful closing of a stock purchase deal between INEOS Energy and CNOOC

BakerHostetler Team Advises CNOOC Holdings USA, Inc. in Stock Purchase Agreement

Services

Real Estate Development

Real Estate

Environmental

Business

Superfund and Contaminated Properties

Emerging Contaminants and Chemicals

<ul>
<li>Represents utilities, municipalities and current property owners in connection with the investigation and remediation of former industrial sites. Has assisted in negotiating settlements with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and with state and local environmental regulatory bodies; represents clients identified as potentially responsible parties under Superfund and similar state programs; identifying other potentially responsible parties; negotiating cost allocation agreements; and litigating allocation and cost recovery claims under Superfund and damages claims under state law.</li>
<li>Defended and negotiated enforcement action settlements on behalf of clients with the United States EPA and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding alleged violations of federal lead-based paint disclosure rules. As part of the preliminary evaluation of the alleged violations, oversaw the client’s lead-based paint risk inspection and risk assessment team efforts in regard to large apartment complexes. Worked with local governmental authorities to address the infrastructure on sites containing lead-based paint.</li>
<li>Defended and negotiated an enforcement action settlement with the United States Department of Justice and the United States Department of Army Corps of Engineers concerning alleged violations of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) and the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Researched and reviewed decades of complex permitting history for the site in relation to various landowners and regulatory authorities, and ultimately assisted in negotiating a settlement on behalf of the then-current landowners for work unintentionally undertaken without appropriate authorizations.</li>
<li>Represented clients in administrative appeals of the United States Department of Army Corps of Engineers&#8217; jurisdictional determinations and permitting decisions. Appealed a Corps jurisdictional determination that certain wetlands were subject to federal jurisdiction and regulation as &#8220;waters of the United States.&#8221; Established that the Corps District was incorrect in asserting jurisdiction based on its application of the then-current regulatory criteria and associated guidance by persuasively arguing that the Corps District&#8217;s administrative record was speculative and did not contain substantial evidence in support of its determination.</li>
</ul>


Kristina R. Ramsey

Kristina R. Ramsey

Experience

Recognitions and Memberships

Insights and News

Credentials

Areas of Focus

Services

Featured Insights